Re: Rebuilding the Man-O-War :)

I'll double check that figure later (gonna play D&D tonight ;) ), in
case it's wrong (like, the complexity of ship's shape may have wonked it
up)

Was taking from external surface, I made the hull 1' thick, as general
rule for SJ ships (simplicity etc), though I'd guess 6 inches is more
likely, 1 foot is nice and solid and easy to work with ;)



-----Original Message-----
From: Spelljammer Setting Discussion
[mailto:SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com] On Behalf Of Charles Taylor
Sent: 06 September 2007 16:36
To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Rebuilding the Man-O-War :)

On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:20:10 +0100, Steven
<steven.james.1@??????????.??.uk> 
wrote:

>9461 cubic feet, not including wings, wing roots and other such, only
>the volume enclosed by the main parts of the hull itself :)
>

Hmm, Thats...

3.5 Tons (Using 1 SJ ton = 100 cubic yards)

7 Tons (Using 1 SJ Ton = 50 cubic yards)

or, for Hackjammer

9 1/2 Tons (Using 1 HJ Ton = 100 cubic feet)

Just a bit on the small size :-) Ok, the wings & wing-roots should add a

bit more volume, and when you say "the volume enclosed by the main parts
of 
the hull itself", is that the internal volume, or the volume including
the 
thickness of the hull?

At the size it is, it still looks good, and would make a nice 
scoutship/courier.

Charles

********************************************************************
The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd
The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.7/992 - Release Date:
06/09/2007 08:36
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.7/992 - Release Date:
06/09/2007 08:36