Previous Message: Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed?
Next Message: Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed?
Month Index: July, 2007
From: Steven <steven.james.1@??????????.??.uk> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:05:54 +0100 Subject: Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed?
Well, a plain old chimp is stronger than a human ;) Wingflaps would have to be connected, or they couldn't work, check other such rl creatures. Armour fastened like that would move around to much, you need the fastening or shape to hold to the rib cage, otherwise it flaps around, and is thus uncomfortable, and less useful. Bit of a catch 22? Aye the ambidexterity was cool! :) ----------------------------------------------------------- I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing. ----------------------------------------------------------- www.silverblades-suitcase.com -----Original Message----- From: Spelljammer Setting Discussion [mailto:SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com] On Behalf Of Edward Swing Sent: 24 July 2007 13:05 To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Hadozee for 3rd ed? Personally, I don't like the "muscular" concept of hadozee. As gliders, they should be more lithe (IMO). Hadozee could conceivably wear armor that was made for them, since the wing flaps are actually not connected to their torso directly (at least in the original illustrations). A chain mail vest, for instance, could be modified to go over the head and then buckle around the waist. Essentially it would be more like a chain mail poncho. I always will consider the hadozee to look like the original lean illustrations in the Spacefarer's handbook. The orangutan-style hadozee of Stormwrack could be a groundling variant. The original hadozee were also tall - frequently around 7 feet tall. One of the aspects of the hadozee that I liked (that was dropped from the Stormwrack writeup) was their inherent ambidexterity (or multidexterity). I enjoyed the idea of fighting with a sword held with my foot. I even used a Lego monkey with cutlasses (one in a hand, one in a foot) to represent my hadozee character for a while. -----Original Message----- From: Steven <steven.james.1@??????????.??.uk> To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com Sent: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 9:43 am Subject: [SPELLJAMMER] Hadozee for 3rd ed? After looking at the versions on SJ.org and Stormwrack, Ive got some problems, hence the re-worked Hadozee in my character pic. 1) Hadozee are supposed to weight 200-250lbs most of it muscle this would suggest a strong creature, yet no strength bonus. Doesnt add up either theyd need to be smaller less muscly, or get +2 STR bonus? 2) Their wing flaps would prevent wearing chest armour. They couldnt use them AND have armour, you couldnt pierce them because theyd rip in flight. So armour would be either very uncomfortable, or unusable. Thus Id suggest giving them Natural AC, either +4, to make up for no armour, or +1 AC / 2 HD for a more balanced approach? 3) The original hadozee pic looked like a sort of baboon//monkey creature, where as the Stormwrack creature looks more like an orangutan type of ape. Which should we go with? I had to use a Spider monkey-looking ape creature for render, because I dont have a baboon or orangutan model, and is more hadozee like to my mind than a baboon or gorilla and grommams are gorilla-like, not hadozee. Hm? :) ----------------------------------------------------------- I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing. ----------------------------------------------------------- www.silverblades-suitcase.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.11/909 - Release Date: 20/07/2007 16:39 ******************************************************************** The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ******************************************************************** The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: 24/07/2007 13:50 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: 24/07/2007 13:50
Previous Message: Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed?
Next Message: Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed?
Month Index: July, 2007
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Steven | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Michael Shell | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Edward Swing | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Matt Hoffman | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Steven | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Steven | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Static | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Loki | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Matt Hoffman | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Steven | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Loki | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Edward Swing | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Matt Hoffman | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Loki | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Edward Swing | |||
| Re: Hadozee for 3rd ed? | Static |