Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting
Next Message: OT-ish, Making an doucment of NPCs for download
Month Index: April, 2007


From:     "gaijin99@??????????.net" <gaijin99@??????????.net>
Date:     Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:54:13 -0500
Subject:  Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting
Blackmaer wrote:
> And then there was one.
>
> (Not counting Ebberon of course.  It was never really part of the scene.  
> Ebberon is like the Tri-Lambdas of the RPG universe.)
>   
Never bought any Ebberon books, since I'm no longer a D20 player, but 
I've glanced through 'em and I thought it looked interesting enough.  Of 
course, I've always liked a slightly higher tech level than the 
traditional high medieval that most AD&D worlds were stuck in, and 
Ebberon looks to have a (very) early renaissance tech level, at least by 
my brief reads.

Still, and all, I won't shed any tears over Dragonlance.  I don't like 
to see WotC reducing the number of options available, but Dragonlance, 
or I suppose I should say the rabid Dragonlance fans, always annoyed 
me.  Besides, everyone knows that sooner or later the tanks will come, 
its inevitable in a Weiss and Hickman setting.

Brad


Previous Message: Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting
Next Message: OT-ish, Making an doucment of NPCs for download
Month Index: April, 2007

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting    David Shepheard    24 Apr 2007 23:21:31
Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting    Blackmaer    28 Apr 2007 22:38:35
Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting    gaijin99@??????????.net    29 Apr 2007 10:54:13
Re: WOTC pulls plug on the Dragonlance Campaign Setting    Trampas Whiteman    01 May 2007 15:47:08

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]