Previous Message: Re: Crystal Shell behaviour proposal
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
From: Jeff Stembel <jeff@??????????.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:52:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
In The Concordance of Arcane Space, page 34, the Sidebar lists the Size classes. Earth is about 8500 miles in diameter; Size E covers 4000 miles to 10000 miles in diameter. Jeff Olander wrote: > Shifting slightly. Where did the numbers to go along with the lettering > scheme come from. I flipped back and forth all through my concordance and > lorebook and couldn't find it. Practical planetology maybe? > > Also.. earth doesn't actually fall into type E.. earth is a small F. > > On 6/4/06, Loki <george.williams.iv@?????.com> wrote: > >> >> I do not think that there is any need to change the size charts used >> in the original set. This is not something that 3.5 has an official >> stance or ruleset for and the old breakdown is integrated into many >> house rules and such that are up on BTM. It is simple and it works. >> There is a certain point where overmuch attention to detail can create >> mechanics that drag. We all have rules we simply do not use out of >> hand in our games because they slow things down and create unhappy >> players (these differ from group to group) >> >> In short I do not think its broke so we shouldn't need to fix it... >> -loki >> >> On 6/4/06, Nils Jeppe <nils@???????????.de> wrote: >> > You still didn't get it. I give up. >> > >> > >> > On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Olander wrote: >> > >> > > I disagree. >> > > If I was up in wildspace circling around earth in a galleon and then >> the >> > > next week I've stopped off over Venus to replenish my air supply, I >> just >> > > don't think that they size difference is enough that you would >> notice. >> > > Enough that they are both effectively 'blue', ignoring the fact that >> earth >> > > is literally blue of course. >> > > >> > > That and some sort formalized size fits nicely in those question >> marks >> on >> > > the sheet that Dreamer posted up. >> > >> > ******************************************************************** >> > The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd >> > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org >> > To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com >> > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. >> > >> >> >> -- >> George "Loki" Williams, writing and other abberrations >> PEACH- Please Examine and Critique Honestly >> >> Section Manager http://www.planewalker.com >> >> Writer/Developer http://www.spelljammer.org >> >> Planejammer- Loki's d20 Site >> http://planejammer.blogspot.com >> Subscribe Via Email:http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48209 >> >> Humid City >> http://humidcity.com >> http://www.myspace.com/humidcity >> http://community.livejournal.com/humidcity >> >> New Orleans Podcasts >> http://neworleansoralhistory.blogspot.com >> Subscribe Via Email: http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48211 >> >> ******************************************************************** >> The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd >> The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org >> To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com >> with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. >> > > ******************************************************************** > The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org > To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.
Previous Message: Re: Crystal Shell behaviour proposal
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Loki | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel |