Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Why Tradesman need large cargo space
Next Message: Re: Crystal Shell behaviour proposal
Month Index: June, 2006


From:     Olander <olander@?????????.net>
Date:     Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:43:43 -0400
Subject:  Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Shifting slightly. Where did the numbers to go along with the lettering
scheme come from. I flipped back and forth all through my concordance and
lorebook and couldn't find it. Practical planetology maybe?

Also.. earth doesn't actually fall into type E.. earth is a small F.

On 6/4/06, Loki <george.williams.iv@?????.com> wrote:
>
> I do not think that there is any need to change the size charts used
> in the original set. This is not something that 3.5 has an official
> stance or ruleset for and the old breakdown is integrated into many
> house rules and such that are up on BTM. It is simple and it works.
> There is a certain point where overmuch attention to detail can create
> mechanics that drag. We all have rules we simply do not use out of
> hand in our games because they slow things down and create unhappy
> players (these differ from group to group)
>
> In short I do not think its broke so we shouldn't need to fix it...
> -loki
>
> On 6/4/06, Nils Jeppe <nils@???????????.de> wrote:
> > You still didn't get it. I give up.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Olander wrote:
> >
> > > I disagree.
> > > If I was up in wildspace circling around earth in a galleon and then
> the
> > > next week I've stopped off over Venus to replenish my air supply, I
> just
> > > don't think that they size difference is enough that you would notice.
> > > Enough that they are both effectively 'blue', ignoring the fact that
> earth
> > > is literally blue of course.
> > >
> > > That and some sort formalized size fits nicely in those question marks
> on
> > > the sheet that Dreamer posted up.
> >
> > ********************************************************************
> > The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd
> > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org
> > To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
> > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.
> >
>
>
> --
> George "Loki" Williams, writing and other abberrations
> PEACH- Please Examine and Critique Honestly
>
> Section Manager          http://www.planewalker.com
>
> Writer/Developer        http://www.spelljammer.org
>
> Planejammer- Loki's d20 Site
> http://planejammer.blogspot.com
> Subscribe Via Email:http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48209
>
> Humid City
> http://humidcity.com
> http://www.myspace.com/humidcity
> http://community.livejournal.com/humidcity
>
> New Orleans Podcasts
> http://neworleansoralhistory.blogspot.com
> Subscribe Via Email: http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48211
>
> ********************************************************************
> The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd
> The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org
> To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
> with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.
>


Previous Message: Re: Why Tradesman need large cargo space
Next Message: Re: Crystal Shell behaviour proposal
Month Index: June, 2006

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Dreamer    03 Jun 2006 11:18:34
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Adam Miller    03 Jun 2006 12:25:18
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    03 Jun 2006 16:18:57
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Night_Druid    03 Jun 2006 17:40:15
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    03 Jun 2006 18:26:09
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    03 Jun 2006 19:09:48
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    03 Jun 2006 20:02:47
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 01:48:34
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 05:17:29
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    04 Jun 2006 18:18:21
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Loki    04 Jun 2006 19:42:55
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 20:43:43
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 20:52:23
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 20:54:50
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 21:02:56

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]