Previous Message: Re: Why Tradesman need large cargo space
Next Message: Re: 3.5 Sphere Sheet - MajSpace
Month Index: June, 2006
From: Loki <george.williams.iv@?????.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 14:42:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
I do not think that there is any need to change the size charts used in the original set. This is not something that 3.5 has an official stance or ruleset for and the old breakdown is integrated into many house rules and such that are up on BTM. It is simple and it works. There is a certain point where overmuch attention to detail can create mechanics that drag. We all have rules we simply do not use out of hand in our games because they slow things down and create unhappy players (these differ from group to group) In short I do not think its broke so we shouldn't need to fix it... -loki On 6/4/06, Nils Jeppe <nils@???????????.de> wrote: > You still didn't get it. I give up. > > > On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Olander wrote: > > > I disagree. > > If I was up in wildspace circling around earth in a galleon and then the > > next week I've stopped off over Venus to replenish my air supply, I just > > don't think that they size difference is enough that you would notice. > > Enough that they are both effectively 'blue', ignoring the fact that earth > > is literally blue of course. > > > > That and some sort formalized size fits nicely in those question marks on > > the sheet that Dreamer posted up. > > ******************************************************************** > The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org > To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. > -- George "Loki" Williams, writing and other abberrations PEACH- Please Examine and Critique Honestly Section Manager http://www.planewalker.com Writer/Developer http://www.spelljammer.org Planejammer- Loki's d20 Site http://planejammer.blogspot.com Subscribe Via Email:http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48209 Humid City http://humidcity.com http://www.myspace.com/humidcity http://community.livejournal.com/humidcity New Orleans Podcasts http://neworleansoralhistory.blogspot.com Subscribe Via Email: http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=48211
Previous Message: Re: Why Tradesman need large cargo space
Next Message: Re: 3.5 Sphere Sheet - MajSpace
Month Index: June, 2006
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Loki | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel |