Previous Message: Re: Ok, major problem: staircases are major headaches!
Next Message: Re: Ok, major problem: staircases are major headaches!
Month Index: June, 2006
From: Nils Jeppe <nils@???????????.de> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 20:18:21 +0200 Subject: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
You still didn't get it. I give up. On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Olander wrote: > I disagree. > If I was up in wildspace circling around earth in a galleon and then the > next week I've stopped off over Venus to replenish my air supply, I just > don't think that they size difference is enough that you would notice. > Enough that they are both effectively 'blue', ignoring the fact that earth > is literally blue of course. > > That and some sort formalized size fits nicely in those question marks on > the sheet that Dreamer posted up.
Previous Message: Re: Ok, major problem: staircases are major headaches!
Next Message: Re: Ok, major problem: staircases are major headaches!
Month Index: June, 2006
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Loki | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel |