Previous Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
From: Night_Druid <Night_Druid@??????????.net> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:40:15 -0500 Subject: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
> Just for a sense of Perspective, the sizes that the DragonStar setting used > were: > Very Small, Small, Medium, Large, Very Large > > Of course Dragonstar didn't have the option for things like flat and torus > shaped planets either. And don't forget that SJ uses the same scale to classify suns and nebulas as well. :) Adam
Previous Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Loki | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel |