Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006


From:     Night_Druid <Night_Druid@??????????.net>
Date:     Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:40:15 -0500
Subject:  Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
> Just for a sense of Perspective, the sizes that the DragonStar setting
used
> were:
> Very Small, Small, Medium, Large, Very Large
>
> Of course Dragonstar didn't have the option for things like flat and torus
> shaped planets either.

And don't forget that SJ uses the same scale to classify suns and nebulas as
well. :)

Adam


Previous Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Dreamer    03 Jun 2006 11:18:34
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Adam Miller    03 Jun 2006 12:25:18
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    03 Jun 2006 16:18:57
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Night_Druid    03 Jun 2006 17:40:15
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    03 Jun 2006 18:26:09
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    03 Jun 2006 19:09:48
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    03 Jun 2006 20:02:47
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 01:48:34
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 05:17:29
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Nils Jeppe    04 Jun 2006 18:18:21
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Loki    04 Jun 2006 19:42:55
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 20:43:43
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 20:52:23
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Olander    04 Jun 2006 20:54:50
Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?    Jeff Stembel    04 Jun 2006 21:02:56

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]