Previous Message: HISTORY: Spelljammer Timeline IIIa
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
From: Olander <olander@?????????.net> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:18:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Just for a sense of Perspective, the sizes that the DragonStar setting used were: Very Small, Small, Medium, Large, Very Large Of course Dragonstar didn't have the option for things like flat and torus shaped planets either. On 6/3/06, Adam Miller <night_druid3000@?????.com> wrote: > > --- Dreamer <dreamer@??????.?????.??.uk> wrote: > > > While I cannot find it in my SJ mailing list > > archives, I assume this is the sort of planetary > size > > chart we are proposing for use with 3rdEd: > > Huh, did a quick search myself and didn't turn up > anything. Strange, I thought I had posted about that. > Anyways, here's what I've been using for MotM (it's > pretty close to your chart) > > Size Class Planetary Size Size > A Planet: Fine Less than 10 miles across > B Planet: Diminutive 10 to 100 miles across > C Planet: Tiny 100 to 1,000 miles across > D Planet: Small 1,000 to 4,000 miles across > E Planet: Medium 4,000 to 10,000 miles across > F Planet: Large 10,000 to 40,000 miles across > G Planet: Huge 40,000 to 100,000 miles across > H Planet: Gargantuan 100,000 to 1,000,000 miles across > I Planet: Colossal 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 miles > across > J Planet: Awesome Greater than 10,000,000 miles across > > I always use both, usually as "Size: Medium (E)" or > something like that so that you just need to know one > set to know the size of the moon. > > Adam > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ******************************************************************** > The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org > To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. >
Previous Message: HISTORY: Spelljammer Timeline IIIa
Next Message: Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd?
Month Index: June, 2006
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Nils Jeppe | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Loki | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Olander | |||
| Re: Planetary Size under 3rdEd? | Jeff Stembel |