Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility
Next Message: Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility
Month Index: March, 2006


From:     jamesriley <jamesriley@???.net>
Date:     Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:41:31 -0500
Subject:  Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility
The fleet ships in my old campaign sphere used invisibility and nondetection
type spells to enhance their missile defenses and to help them close with
enemy forces undetected, however, a souped up glitterdust spell and/or
detect invisibility spells usually cancelled out the "cloaking" if used
properly. Also, my players seemed to think that dark paint schemes on their
vessels helped in regards to camouflage, my contention was that there was
indeed times when you actually DID want to have your ship noticed and that
bright colors helped when you needed desperately to have a friendly vessel
spot you for search and rescue. 

V/R FC2 Riley, James R. 
cel: 228-249-2967
e-mail: jamesriley@???.net

-----Original Message-----



> That in mind, I've been considering cloaking helms
> and ship 
> invisibility spells.  There is a spell called 'Ship
> Invisibility', I 
> think it's 4th level, in an issue of _Dungeon_
> magazine (an adventure 
[----------S-N-I-P----------]
> dropped to tactical 
> speed.  It says the elves had 'moved in for a closer
> look' just 
> before the attack.
> 
> Comments?

IMC, some ship have cloaking devices that can make the
whole ship invisible, while an iron-clad vessel type
called the sub-mariner can cloak itself by dipping the
whole ship into etherealspace. They both function the
same way, allowing non-detection by nearby normal
space area ships. Depending on the type of
invisibility, I would allow normal ways of detecting
invisibility to work in space, magical or creative
ways. If I was playing and I suspect a ship might be
invisible in my area and I can guess it's general
position, I would shoot a catapult shot packed with
flour to help detect them before opening up with
powder shot and stone shots.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

********************************************************************
The D&D Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd
The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.


Previous Message: Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility
Next Message: Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility
Month Index: March, 2006

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Paul Westermeyer    04 Mar 2006 14:42:11
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Ariel Sibal    05 Mar 2006 04:56:50
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Alessandro La Vekkia Damiani    05 Mar 2006 12:08:28
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Dreamer    05 Mar 2006 21:21:03
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Rian A. McMurtry    05 Mar 2006 23:42:20
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    David Shepheard    05 Mar 2006 23:56:10
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    David Shepheard    06 Mar 2006 13:41:18
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    jamesriley    06 Mar 2006 22:41:31
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Danton May    08 Mar 2006 18:44:10
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    jamesriley    08 Mar 2006 22:15:47
Re: Spelljamming speed, and invisibility    Danton May    21 Mar 2006 16:49:42

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]