Re: SJ Reviews: The 'SJR' References

In <URL:news:local.spelljam> on Tue 21 Feb, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Dreamer wrote:
> 
> > So, reading below the "must have"s are: 'Rock of Bral', followed
> > by 'Space Lairs', with 'Lost Ships' and 'Practical Planetology'
> > being "possibles".
> 
> I'll have to stop deleting mail so quickly, I missed those reviews. Lost 
> Ships includes a bunch of "bonus" goodies, Practical Planetology was 
> pretty nice as it has a bunch of planets you can just drop onto your 
> players (although the ringworld-knockoff was just sad).
> 
> Never really liked the Rock of Bral myself.
> 
> > Do you think it would be worthwhile people trying to write-up
> > their own 'Realmspace', 'Greyspace', and 'Krynnspace'?
> 
> If you're going to do that, why bother with the official worlds? Create 
> your own. I am doing just that at the moment (as always, work schedule and 
> recently WoW are distracting me a bit much though).

I thought the whole point was that the three official worlds had
masses of background, lots of it quite good, it was just the
surrounding crystal spheres, 'Whatever Space', that was not done
too well?

-- 
Dreamer
dreamer@??????.?????.??.uk
http://www.romsys.demon.co.uk/