Previous Message: Re: Hackjammer - Initial Thoughts and Overview!
Next Message: Ok More SJ art :)
Month Index: July, 2005
From: "Steven \(Silverblade\)" <steven.james.1@??????????.??.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:55:55 +0100 Subject: Re: Hackjammer - Question
Giff rule, they shoulda been in3rd Ed, grr! -----Original Message----- From: Discussion list for the Spelljammer campaign setting [mailto:SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com] On Behalf Of Rian A. McMurtry Sent: 20 July 2005 19:54 To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Hackjammer - Question Not really being a 3.Xer, (and not having a copy yet...next week!), it's sort of hard to say. The setting and ships should be useable enough. I don't know if Giff were ever done up for 3.X. My best suggestion is to pick up a copy and take a look. I think it's worth picking up for any game--but, then, I'm a little biased. :-) ******************************************************************** The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.
Previous Message: Re: Hackjammer - Initial Thoughts and Overview!
Next Message: Ok More SJ art :)
Month Index: July, 2005
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hackjammer - Question | Nathaniel Olsen | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Rian A. McMurtry | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Steven (Silverblade) | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Michael Shell | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Night_Druid | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Michael Shell | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Trampas Whiteman | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Hackjammer - Question | Mark Vorwerk |