Previous Message: Re: Elven Flitters was What is a "conventional engine"?
Next Message: Coinage Postfest!
Month Index: March, 2005
From: Danton May <coyotedkm@?????.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:08:22 -0800 Subject: Re: What is a "conventional engine"?
Whether a flitter moved its wings or not would not really make a difference. That only has meaning when you are flying through an atmosphere, with air to push against your wings. If a flitter leaves the atmosphere, true it brings an air buble away with it, but moving its wings would not make a difference because pushing against the air is not the issue. The air bubble it brought with it would not be big enough to have enough air to push against. A bird flys because it is "swimming" through an ocean of air. Imagine there is a column of air inderneath the bird's wings, with the earth all the way at the bottom of it. The land on the other side of the column of air holds the other side of the air colum steady and pushes it back. But with no land, ocean bottom, or other stable platform a the edge of a free floating bubble of air there is nothing to push on "the other side" of the air the flitter's wings would push on if they moved, the air at the edge of the bubble would just move away as the flitter's wings moved, giving them no resistance or motive force. The edge of the bubble would just distort and ripple, and the flitter would go nowhere. Now, that is explaining it using physics. At issue here is really that there is a magical force pushing against the flitter's wings, propelling the ship. This force does not even really need the wings to move for it to act upon them, but they're usefull as foci. The propulsion magic is not a powerful enough force to achieve spelljamming speeds, but it can propell the flitter at "conventional" speeds. It is a magic that is worked into the nature of the ship. The wings aren't really necessary at all, but most magics need a foci of some sort, and the more that foci is attuned to some mental image we have that is related to the goal of the magic the eeasier it is to make the magic work. Wings make us think of flight, so wings are nice foci for flying magic. But if you can't imagine a flitter working without wings that move, them make their wings move. As far as physics go it is not an issue, so think in terms of pure magic. --- David Shepheard <david_shepheard@???????.com> wrote: > >From: "Tauster" <chefseehund@???.de> > >Subject: [SPELLJAMMER] What is a "conventional > engine"? > > > >another thing that bugs me: does the elven flitter > move its wings when > >flying? the name implies that, but i didn“t read a > description yet. the > >same goes with the dragonfly, damselfly or wasp: do > their wings move or do > >they just "glide"? > > >i am for the moving-wings- version, because the > description of the flitter > >states that it can go OUT of an atmosphere, which > would be kind of > >difficult with a glider- the pilot would have to > rely on upwinds that > >actually blow his ship out of (!) the athmosphere. > > A kite is capable of achieving lift without > "flapping its wings" all that is required is > to point it into a wind. Perhaps the elves use some > sort of magic to give lift from a > world and use the angle and direction of the ship > for stearing it (hence the controls). > > Looking at the picture of the elven flitter, I think > it looks like the wings are fixed. > The elven ships seem to be grown like plants and > plant ships would seem to imply no > movement or very slow movement in the wings. > > Alternatively, perhaps the flitter (and other > similar elven craft) has a small degree of > movement in the edges of its wings that makes them > act similar to flaps on an aircraft. > However, I think I'd prefer it if the wings were > solid and the elven made body of the ship > had some sort of rudders and other controls for > steering. > > David "Big Mac" Shepheard > Virtual Eclipse Role Playing Club > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/virtualeclipselrp/links/d20_system_001071937434/Spelljammer_001071430476 > http://virtualeclipse.aboho.com/ > > ******************************************************************** > The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd > The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.spelljammer.org > To unsubscribe, send email to > LISTSERV@??????.???????.com > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. > __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Previous Message: Re: Elven Flitters was What is a "conventional engine"?
Next Message: Coinage Postfest!
Month Index: March, 2005
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is a "conventional engine"? | Tauster | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Rian A. McMurtry | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Jason Hosler | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Novamaster | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | SUBSCRIBE REALMS-L tauster | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Tauster | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Clint Whelly | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Clint Whelly | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Idran | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Mark Vorwerk | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Danton May | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Mark Vorwerk | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Dreamer | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | George "Loki" Williams | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Clint Whelly | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Mark Vorwerk | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Clint Whelly | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | David Shepheard | |||
| Re: What is a "conventional engine"? | Richard Gant |