Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: alchemists ballista bolt
Next Message: Re: alchemists ballista bolt
Month Index: March, 2004


From:     Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com>
Date:     Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:58:06 -0800
Subject:  Re: The _Flowfish_
> Also, though the designers seemed to think SJ encouraged higher level
> I feel it encourages lower level play.  The ship provides low level
> PCs with more power than a typical wandering adventuring band, but
> not much more.

SJ can make high level play unbearable.  Every battle you enter the
spellcasters (except the one on the helm letting you outrun every other
thing) all have full spell rosters.  In high level play most adventures
are based on the idea that spellcasters will have their spells
"drained" by a succession of encounters.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you^Òre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com


Previous Message: Re: alchemists ballista bolt
Next Message: Re: alchemists ballista bolt
Month Index: March, 2004

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
The _Flowfish_    Paul Westermeyer    08 Mar 2004 21:12:50
Re: The _Flowfish_    George "Loki" Williams    09 Mar 2004 00:33:38
Re: The _Flowfish_    Night_Druid    09 Mar 2004 01:40:08
Re: The _Flowfish_    Paul Westermeyer    09 Mar 2004 19:33:01
Re: The _Flowfish_    George "Loki" Williams    09 Mar 2004 23:36:05
Re: The _Flowfish_    Night_Druid    10 Mar 2004 00:23:59
Re: The _Flowfish_    Night_Druid    10 Mar 2004 00:35:12
Re: The _Flowfish_    Static    11 Mar 2004 02:09:06
Re: The _Flowfish_    Paul Westermeyer    11 Mar 2004 17:50:12
Re: The _Flowfish_    Paul Westermeyer    11 Mar 2004 17:53:50
Re: The _Flowfish_    Night_Druid    11 Mar 2004 22:28:03
Re: The _Flowfish_    Thatotherguy    12 Mar 2004 16:58:06

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]