Previous Message: Re: Magical ecology?
Next Message: Small Ships
Month Index: January, 2004
From: Richard Gant <richard_gant@???????.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:44:30 +0000 Subject: Re: short questions (long-winded answer)
>From: Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com>
>With that accelaration the green slime undoubtedly dies during
>acceleration, long before it potentially strikes anything. And if it
>doesn't then the simply striking of air molecules as it leaves the air
>envelope should finish it off (think of it like a neutron bomb).
Of course, that assumes that Spelljammer has anything as mundane as "air
molecules". I mean, it certainly has indivisible atoms of pure elemental
Air, but - given the way gravity functions - do we need to assume the
existence of electrons, protons, or molecules?
I think not. (Your mileage may vary, of course.)
Richard Gant
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words;
on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them
unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
-James Nicoll
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Previous Message: Re: Magical ecology?
Next Message: Small Ships
Month Index: January, 2004
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: short questions (long-winded answer) | Michael Billard | |||
| Re: short questions (long-winded answer) | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: short questions (long-winded answer) | Michael Billard | |||
| Re: short questions (long-winded answer) | Richard Gant |