Previous Message: Re: SPELLJAMMER-L Digest - 31 Dec 2003 to 4 Jan 2004 (#2004-2)
Next Message: Re: Just some thought!
Month Index: January, 2004
From: Ariel Sibal <asibal_2000@?????.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 03:39:54 -0800 Subject: Re: SPELLJAMMER-L Digest - 31 Dec 2003 to 4 Jan 2004 (#2004-2)
Yeah, I thought catapults are tension powered weapon while a trebuchet is a counterweight type weapon. I think it can be use as a siege weapons against fortified asteroids. So the weapon would be specialized in it's use in any naval engagement. Maybe used on something like an elven Armada or a Ark ship to be able to handle the weapon. A.Sibal --- smu anonymous <sxoa@?????.com> wrote: > I was of the understanding, though I could most > certaintly (and most likely) be wrong, that heavy > catapults were trebuchets. However I also disagree > with this because trebuchets and catapults are > fundamentally different kinds of machines. A > catapult works of the tension in wound rope, hair, > etc. where as a trebuchet launches its payload with > a massive counterwait. > > I thnk it could probably be used by capital ships > and such that didn't have to much rigging overhead, > but thats my thought. IIRC the historical trebuchet > outraged the early bombards so I would give it at > the very least more hexes than those but I'm not > totally sure. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Previous Message: Re: SPELLJAMMER-L Digest - 31 Dec 2003 to 4 Jan 2004 (#2004-2)
Next Message: Re: Just some thought!
Month Index: January, 2004
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: SPELLJAMMER-L Digest - 31 Dec 2003 to 4 Jan 2004 (#2004-2) | smu anonymous | |||
| Re: SPELLJAMMER-L Digest - 31 Dec 2003 to 4 Jan 2004 (#2004-2) | Ariel Sibal |