Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Waterjammers
Next Message: Waterjammers
Month Index: May, 2003


From:     Jim Kersh <tiffinki@???????.com>
Date:     Tue, 27 May 2003 04:59:50 -0500
Subject:  Re: Waterjammers
Hey, Leroy?

I've been reading the Waterjammer discussion, and I had a thought.

Tonnage refers to the ship itself, not what's in its gravity envelope - and
yet, water is so much heavier than air, it's a big stretch to think that
filling the envelope with water would not change things a bit. (Air has
weight, but water has *more* weight - quite a lot more).

How about this - the water adds *weight*, but not tonnage. I'm not sure how
to express my thought, exactly, but perhaps it would change things somewhat
like a Colossal-sized dragon grabbing the ship for a ride. (That's not the
same order of magnitude, but I'm sure you see what I mean). Or, loading up
too much heavy cargo into a starship might cause a similar problem.

Also, I think that a water-filled envelope would cause maneuverability
problems, unless the ship used steering devices other than sails. A ship
steered with oars might not be too much affected, but I'm thinking that
sails would be a BEAR to use inside a water envelope - so much so that I
doubt anyone would ever try it. A tiller oar would be a good alternative.

Just a couple thoughts tossed out,

Jim

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


Previous Message: Re: Waterjammers
Next Message: Waterjammers
Month Index: May, 2003

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Waterjammers    Ariel Sibal    26 May 2003 05:48:44
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    26 May 2003 06:25:31
Re: Waterjammers    Rian A. McMurtry    26 May 2003 06:43:32
Re: Waterjammers    Tilaurin    26 May 2003 07:07:19
Re: Waterjammers    Flits3 Frietmuts    26 May 2003 08:46:28
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    26 May 2003 15:54:24
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    26 May 2003 20:10:32
Re: Waterjammers    Rian A. McMurtry    26 May 2003 21:47:13
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    26 May 2003 20:14:52
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    26 May 2003 20:14:24
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    27 May 2003 00:07:17
Re: Waterjammers    Nancy E (Lea) Hall    27 May 2003 01:06:11
Re: Waterjammers    Tilaurin    27 May 2003 01:41:55
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    27 May 2003 03:37:31
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    27 May 2003 03:40:30
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    27 May 2003 03:58:59
Waterjammers    Jim Kersh    27 May 2003 09:59:50
Waterjammers    Ariel Sibal    27 May 2003 10:00:06
Re: Waterjammers    Ariel Sibal    27 May 2003 10:21:23
Re: Waterjammers    Ariel Sibal    27 May 2003 11:12:11
Re: Waterjammers    Ariel Sibal    27 May 2003 11:22:31
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    27 May 2003 15:04:49
Re: Waterjammers    Brian Brousseau    27 May 2003 22:37:26
Re: Waterjammers    Leroy Van Camp III    27 May 2003 23:33:53
Re: Waterjammers    Eric Collins    28 May 2003 05:23:09
Waterjammers    Jim Kersh    30 May 2003 11:10:00
Re: Waterjammers    woodelf    30 May 2003 14:28:31
Re: Waterjammers    Thatotherguy    04 Jun 2003 02:50:53
Re: Waterjammers    Thatotherguy    04 Jun 2003 03:04:04
Re: Waterjammers    Thatotherguy    04 Jun 2003 03:35:37

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]