Re: little question

>Hey folks back in town (at least for a little while) thanks to Uncle Sam.
>Anyway, I couldn't help but respond to this one.
>
>I find 3e more capable of being 'character unique' than 2e.  To me 2e
>seemed to have cookie cutter characters even with the addition of the kits.

Really? I have found that 2e is more 'character unique' than 3e, at least
without adding prestige classes to every single character. I think this is
mostly because of the 2e weapon proficiency rules. Of course, this is only
an initial opinion, as I have not had a chance to play a full 3e game yet.

However, despite this, I do like 3e. I'm just not using it for my SJ games
at this time. I think (as has already been said) that it would change the
flavour of an SJ game, although it might not be a bad change.



--
Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other "sins" are
invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful -- just stupid.)
                       -- Lazarus Long

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus