Previous Message: Re: 3e Spelljammer Cosmology
Next Message: 3e Spelljammer Cosmology (part two - the phlogiston)
Month Index: October, 2002
From: Robert Blezard <rblezard@???????.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:40:23 -0600 Subject: Re: Let's Talk
----- Original Message ----- Wrom: XOEAIJJPHSCRTNHGSWZIDREXCAXZO To: "Robert Blezard" <rblezard@???????????.net> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:43 PM Subject: Re: New mod in town > Okay, now I'm really confused. Why are you still trying > to reinvigorate this group? (I'm genuinely curious, not sarcastic.) > Do you prefer yahoo's interface? Do you dislike the people on SJL? > Do you not like the way the council is handling the setting? Do you > feel left out of the descisions that were made before you found us? I understand your concerns Static but I don't see it that way. I've stated on the SJML that I want anyone who joins the group to make sure they are still a part of the SJML as well. Plus, I've placed a link for the SJML in the links section of the yahoo group. And yes I like yahoo's interface. I've got used to it being a member of the DSD20 yahoo group. And I like the people on the SJML just fine, although I am a newbie on the list so I don't really know them all just yet. I'm happy with what the Council has done and don't feel left out at all. In fact, I'm looking forward to given my opinion on things in the future. However, if you don't want me to promote the yahoo group on the SJML, I won't. I'm not looking to start a war or anything. I really believe their is room for both groups. Plus, the material I'm working on won't go on the yahoo group until I've run it past the SJML first and if it is given a place on Beyond the Moons then I won't be duplicating it in the yahoo group's file section. What would be the point? In conclusion, I see the yahoo group as more of a place to banter around strange, new concepts that break away from the normal aspects of the Spelljammer campaign setting. Say if you want to add some low-grade tech to your campaign or change the nature of wildspace to be more realistic than the standard or make the phlogiston even wilder in nature. Who knows? IMO, any talk about spelljammer is good talk. What does everyone else think? Opinions, complaints, threats? Robert Blezard Edmonton, Alberta Canada rblezard@???????.com rblezard@???????????.net Co-moderator of the Spelljammer Yahoo Group and new member of the Spelljammer Mailing List.
Previous Message: Re: 3e Spelljammer Cosmology
Next Message: 3e Spelljammer Cosmology (part two - the phlogiston)
Month Index: October, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Let's Talk | Robert Blezard | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Patrick Stutzman | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Mark T. Doolan | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Joe Kelly | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Static | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Joe Kelly | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Rian A. McMurtry | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Alfred O'Meagher | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Robert Blezard | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Mark T. Doolan | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Charles D. Sykora | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | JJJ | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Ray Morris | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Let's Talk | Alfred O'Meagher |