Previous Message: Re: MISC: Gencon
Next Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Month Index: August, 2002
From: Kristina Leth <kcleth@?????.com> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:51:23 -0700 Subject: Re: Leroy's 3e
Hi Leroy! Great stuff, I really like it! Sorry for the slow response! Some questions and comments: Ship Construction: 1a) What is the reason for reducing the air supply to 50% (two man months per ton vs. four man months in the old rules)? 1b) Will you extend the list with sample ship stats to include all the ships from the original rules? (I know it might be quite extensive) Ship Combat: 2a) I think that a combat example with the various aspects of movement and combat would be nice. 2b) It is written in ship weapons-section sub-section concerning specific targets and sub-sub-section on targeting weapons that the AC of the weapon does not suffer any penalties the ship gains from move actions. Why? It should (in my opinion) be easier to hit a weapon if the ship makes an unfavourable move. 2c) ship weapons and the ready action. I cant figure what the penalty is for using the ready action for ship weapons. If the penalty doesnt exist, then it should be stated that the ship weapon could be fired at any time the crew leader pleases. 2d) I cant figure the base ram damage described in the sections concerning ramming. It is stated that the base damage of the attacking ship is 2 times the ships tonnage while the base damage from the victim is the equal to the target ships hit points before it was rammed. I made a small example for myself: 2 non-damaged hammerships, hit each other head on, the speed of each ship is 5, base damage done to the victim is 800 ((5+5)*2*40) hit point while base damage to the attacker is 1680 hit points (2*840). Even if the attacker makes his/her save and reduces the damage to 840 hit points, he/she still suffers the majority of the damage. Have I missed some thing (misunderstood the text) or should the base damage done to the attacker be reduced? Suggestion to reduction is to 50% of the damage inflicted on the victim. 2e) Do you got plans for introducing the great bombard from the good old Giff preferred great bombard ship, described in War Captains Companion, to the ship weapon list? This was a lot of comments to a great new system. Keep up the good work! Regards, Caspar __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
Previous Message: Re: MISC: Gencon
Next Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Month Index: August, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Andrew Ellem | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Leroy's 3e | Kristina Leth | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III |