Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Next Message: separable hulls
Month Index: July, 2002


From:     Tilaurin <tilaurin@?????????????????.com>
Date:     Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:52:58 +0930
Subject:  Re: Leroy's 3e
Before i start...

> But, in the end, I write this crap up for myself.

THE LIST OGRE SWORE!! BAN HIM BAN HIM!!

ok, now stupidness aside ;)

> I did like how you set up the one sheet using drop down
> boxes. This is handy for me since I already planned on
> using drop down boxes in the next version. I have never
> worked with drop down boxes in Excel, so your sheet
> will come in handy as a reference.

Aye I preffered it too, notice I had an extra box for turret direction??  If
anyone else wants ta see the sheet I'd be happy for static to put it on BTM.

> Well that is pretty obvious, now isn't it? : )

<cough cough>

> Well, in mine I explain the triop's maneuverability with
> the advanced form and topped out rigging.
>
> As for other stuff, I am certainly open to suggestions.
> I have an idea or two for more advanced features. But, before
> I dive into that kind of thing I would like to get the basic, core
> stuff taken care of and solid. That kind of stuff works best
> when added to a tested and solid base of rules.

Good point.  I mostly memorised ya old system, and i rekn i'd rather wait
til I have this one down straight aswell before I start flooding the list
with ridiculous ideas:)

> See above. Besides, shell ships cover ships that split into two.

Ah.  what about ships that split into three?  EH??  and what if its not a
sheel type setup, like how I wrote up a catamaran version of the arrowing
that had seperable hulls ;)  EH?!

> I would add such things once I had 3e versions of them.

Well, chop chop!

> I am not so much worried that its not going off well, I am just
> surprised at the minimal response. I am not honestly bragging
> here, but my previous system might very well have been the
> mostly widely used home-brew rules system of any type for
> Spelljammer. Given that, it is surprising that a new version
> has recieved, so far, so little response. There could be lots
> of reasons, and I am not too worried about it, but I am still
> surprised.

Yeah, the old system rocked!

> I do appreciate the feedback, Til. I appreciate the spreadsheets
> as well.
>
>
> Leroy Van Camp III

Mate, netime :)  Just wish i got the same ammount of feedback as you lol!
Hey, now that im gunna go dl the newer PDF's, if I have any ideas for new
materials etc (as I rekn I will, considering the amount of new ones I put in
that spreadsheet I sent you), wanna have a read?

Tilaurin
tilaurin@?????????????????.com
The angels are lost in divine contemplation of an infinite glory.


Previous Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Next Message: separable hulls
Month Index: July, 2002

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Leroy's 3e    Tilaurin    23 Jul 2002 14:16:22
Re: Leroy's 3e    Leroy Van Camp III    24 Jul 2002 00:52:55
Re: Leroy's 3e    Tilaurin    24 Jul 2002 14:14:02
Re: Leroy's 3e    Thatotherguy    24 Jul 2002 14:17:55
Re: Leroy's 3e    Leroy Van Camp III    25 Jul 2002 03:45:34
Re: Leroy's 3e    Andrew Ellem    25 Jul 2002 08:22:17
Re: Leroy's 3e    Tilaurin    25 Jul 2002 11:22:58
Re: Leroy's 3e    Leroy Van Camp III    26 Jul 2002 04:39:03
Re: Leroy's 3e    Leroy Van Camp III    26 Jul 2002 04:47:27
Re: Leroy's 3e    Tilaurin    26 Jul 2002 10:39:06
Leroy's 3e    Kristina Leth    07 Aug 2002 08:51:23
Re: Leroy's 3e    Leroy Van Camp III    08 Aug 2002 02:47:29

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]