Previous Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Next Message: separable hulls
Month Index: July, 2002
From: Tilaurin <tilaurin@?????????????????.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:52:58 +0930 Subject: Re: Leroy's 3e
Before i start... > But, in the end, I write this crap up for myself. THE LIST OGRE SWORE!! BAN HIM BAN HIM!! ok, now stupidness aside ;) > I did like how you set up the one sheet using drop down > boxes. This is handy for me since I already planned on > using drop down boxes in the next version. I have never > worked with drop down boxes in Excel, so your sheet > will come in handy as a reference. Aye I preffered it too, notice I had an extra box for turret direction?? If anyone else wants ta see the sheet I'd be happy for static to put it on BTM. > Well that is pretty obvious, now isn't it? : ) <cough cough> > Well, in mine I explain the triop's maneuverability with > the advanced form and topped out rigging. > > As for other stuff, I am certainly open to suggestions. > I have an idea or two for more advanced features. But, before > I dive into that kind of thing I would like to get the basic, core > stuff taken care of and solid. That kind of stuff works best > when added to a tested and solid base of rules. Good point. I mostly memorised ya old system, and i rekn i'd rather wait til I have this one down straight aswell before I start flooding the list with ridiculous ideas:) > See above. Besides, shell ships cover ships that split into two. Ah. what about ships that split into three? EH?? and what if its not a sheel type setup, like how I wrote up a catamaran version of the arrowing that had seperable hulls ;) EH?! > I would add such things once I had 3e versions of them. Well, chop chop! > I am not so much worried that its not going off well, I am just > surprised at the minimal response. I am not honestly bragging > here, but my previous system might very well have been the > mostly widely used home-brew rules system of any type for > Spelljammer. Given that, it is surprising that a new version > has recieved, so far, so little response. There could be lots > of reasons, and I am not too worried about it, but I am still > surprised. Yeah, the old system rocked! > I do appreciate the feedback, Til. I appreciate the spreadsheets > as well. > > > Leroy Van Camp III Mate, netime :) Just wish i got the same ammount of feedback as you lol! Hey, now that im gunna go dl the newer PDF's, if I have any ideas for new materials etc (as I rekn I will, considering the amount of new ones I put in that spreadsheet I sent you), wanna have a read? Tilaurin tilaurin@?????????????????.com The angels are lost in divine contemplation of an infinite glory.
Previous Message: Re: Leroy's 3e
Next Message: separable hulls
Month Index: July, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Andrew Ellem | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Tilaurin | |||
| Leroy's 3e | Kristina Leth | |||
| Re: Leroy's 3e | Leroy Van Camp III |