Previous Message: Re: NWN
Next Message: Re: OT: NWN
Month Index: July, 2002
From: Flits3 Frietmuts <j.w.van.den.heuvel@???????.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:15:41 +0200 Subject: Re: Dweomerborn
Why didn't I think of the Great Undead. Grrrr. Once again Static dazzles
us with his clean vision (really no flame here, just real admiration since
Mark is reviewing my convertions).
I just lean too much for the living that I sometimes forget the dead.
FLITS3
Static <eshum@????????.org>
Sent by: Discussion list for the Spelljammer campaign setting
<SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com>
2002-06-29 02:43
Please respond to Discussion list for the Spelljammer campaign setting
To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com
cc: (bcc: J W van den Heuvel/EHV/CORP/PHILIPS)
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Dweomerborn
Classification:
In our last episode, Mark T. Doolan said:
>If I had to really choose one of the above five I would be choose
Elemental (Magic), but would lean also to Construct that is accidentally
created.
You forgot Undead. :) Dweomerborn are just "dead" magic (i.e.
the exhaust of a helm) that's been brought to life.
-Static
--
PAK CHOOIE UNF
--==<< http://www.darkwood.org/ >>==--
********************************************************************
The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp
The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.
Previous Message: Re: NWN
Next Message: Re: OT: NWN
Month Index: July, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dweomerborn | Mark T. Doolan | |||
| Re: Dweomerborn | Static | |||
| Re: Dweomerborn | Flits3 Frietmuts | |||
| Re: Dweomerborn | Static |