Previous Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Next Message: stupid test, ignore
Month Index: June, 2002
From: Adam Miller <nghtdrud@??????.net> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:35:41 -0500 Subject: Re: Tactical Speed
> > I'll toss an idea into the shark pool for folks to shred:) What do > > you think of changing the size of hexes down to 100 yards from 500? > > While keeping SR as noted (SR 1 = 1 hex of tactical movement).Thus, > > spells would not be as completely useless beyond a hex and flying > > creatures like pegasai would become much more interesting:) > > And now you have to deal with ships larger than hexes. Even the > hammership and squid are almost 100 yards long (250 feet keel each). Well, Hammership is actually about 200' long by the deckplan, though the squid is probably 250' (that forward ram is HUGE:). An Armada would completely fill one hex, though, between keel & wings (wings might spread out over multiple hexes, as might the MOW wings). Adam Miller
Previous Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Next Message: stupid test, ignore
Month Index: June, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tactical Speed | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Chris W | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Flits3 Frietmuts | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Static | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Mark T. Doolan | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | David Stairs | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | Static | |||
| Re: Tactical Speed | David Stairs |