Previous Message: Re: Rule problem?
Next Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Month Index: June, 2002
From: Diane Morrison <Sable@??????-????.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:02:01 -0700 Subject: Re: Companies in Spelljammer
But don't forget, Spelljammer is a magical society, so why not hire a mage to keep casting cold-natured spells at the mangoes? Then you could sell them anywhere you wanted? Yours truly, Sable --- Michael Sandy <wuggadad@??????.com> wrote: >>--- George LaValle <flamebringer@???????.com> heckled: >> > ... >> > Yeah... >> > Pirates are suddenly going to start stealing MANGOES!!! SOMEBODY >> > PROTECT THE >> > MANGOES!!! >> >>If they are such valuable cargo in the first place you bet they will. > >I think that it would be wise to make a distinction between _valuable_ >cargo and _profitable_ cargo. > >If you can buy and ship mangos to market for 3 days ship's crew >wages, 1 days dock crew wages, and 200 3rd World day laborer >days pay, and sell for twice that, you have a profitable cargo. > >_However_, that is not a _valuable_ cargo. If overhead and >maintainence come to 1000 gp/month, and you can complete >7 runs with a profit per run of 300 gp, say 30 gp/HS, you >are doing pretty well. > >If you have to spend 2 months for a run with cargo worth 10,000 gp, >you would need more than a 10% markup to break even. > >Finished items, like steel bars, might sell for 10 times that cost per >ton of ship space, but with only a 10% mark up, they would be a >much more capital intense cargo, and vulnerable to small percentage >change fluctuations in the market. > >> >>Then why is anyone carrying them as cargo? > >Some cargos are going to be seasonable, based on when the transit >time is short enough to justify the small mark up. > >A run for ice or mangos could be worth it when the source is >fairly close by, because of the low cost of the good at the >source. > >Sometimes a consistent income is worth it. A spaceport might >be served by one ship making the ice run. If someone else >started making the ice run too, the price would crash, so there >is no worry about competition, as there would be no point. > >The low value of the good means that robbery isn't much of a problem, >just worrying about someone taking the ship. For these runs, use >really cheap helms, like Create Minor Helm spells and you don't even >need to worry about that, it would be too much trouble for most >pirates to even bother, and the crew would keep most of their >valuables in port. > >Figure 10,000 gp for a barge and a spell, and at 1,000 gp/month >profit over wages and you could pay it off in under a year. That >looks like an appealing venture to me! > >Michael Sandy > >******************************************************************** >The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp >The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/ >To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com >with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. _____________________________________________________________ Alex's Coupons, run by our own webmaster whose daughter has Leukemia, brings you the latest online shopping deals and coupon codes to save you tons of money. 10% of any profits from the site are donated to Childhood Cancer charities. The remaining profits help pay for Alex's ongoing medical and insurance expenses. To learn more visit: http://www.redjellyfish.com/cgi-bin/ad-eagle/go.pl?rtn=emailredir
Previous Message: Re: Rule problem?
Next Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Month Index: June, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Sebastian Lucier | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | George LaValle | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Sebastian Lucier | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Burt Zoellick | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Burt Zoellick | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Companies in Spelljammer | Diane Morrison |