Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Rule problem?
Next Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Month Index: June, 2002


From:     Diane Morrison <Sable@??????-????.com>
Date:     Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:02:01 -0700
Subject:  Re: Companies in Spelljammer
But don't forget, Spelljammer is a magical society, so why not hire a
mage to keep casting cold-natured spells at the mangoes?  Then you could
sell them anywhere you wanted?

Yours truly,
Sable

--- Michael Sandy <wuggadad@??????.com> wrote:
>>--- George LaValle <flamebringer@???????.com> heckled:
>> > ...
>> > Yeah...
>> > Pirates are suddenly going to start stealing MANGOES!!! SOMEBODY
>> > PROTECT THE
>> > MANGOES!!!
>>
>>If they are such valuable cargo in the first place you bet they will.
>
>I think that it would be wise to make a distinction between _valuable_
>cargo and _profitable_ cargo.
>
>If you can buy and ship mangos to market for 3 days ship's crew
>wages, 1 days dock crew wages, and 200 3rd World day laborer
>days pay, and sell for twice that, you have a profitable cargo.
>
>_However_, that is not a _valuable_ cargo.  If overhead and
>maintainence come to 1000 gp/month, and you can complete
>7 runs with a profit per run of 300 gp, say 30 gp/HS, you
>are doing pretty well.
>
>If you have to spend 2 months for a run with cargo worth 10,000 gp,
>you would need more than a 10% markup to break even.
>
>Finished items, like steel bars, might sell for 10 times that cost per
>ton of ship space, but with only a 10% mark up, they would be a
>much more capital intense cargo, and vulnerable to small percentage
>change fluctuations in the market.
>
>>
>>Then why is anyone carrying them as cargo?
>
>Some cargos are going to be seasonable, based on when the transit
>time is short enough to justify the small mark up.
>
>A run for ice or mangos could be worth it when the source is
>fairly close by, because of the low cost of the good at the
>source.
>
>Sometimes a consistent income is worth it.  A spaceport might
>be served by one ship making the ice run.  If someone else
>started making the ice run too, the price would crash, so there
>is no worry about competition, as there would be no point.
>
>The low value of the good means that robbery isn't much of a problem,
>just worrying about someone taking the ship.  For these runs, use
>really cheap helms, like Create Minor Helm spells and you don't even
>need to worry about that, it would be too much trouble for most
>pirates to even bother, and the crew would keep most of their
>valuables in port.
>
>Figure 10,000 gp for a barge and a spell, and at 1,000 gp/month
>profit over wages and you could pay it off in under a year.  That
>looks like an appealing venture to me!
>
>Michael Sandy
>
>********************************************************************
>The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp
>The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/
>To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
>with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.

_____________________________________________________________
Alex's Coupons, run by our own webmaster whose daughter has Leukemia,
brings you the latest online shopping deals and coupon codes to save you
tons of money. 10% of any profits from the site are donated to Childhood
Cancer charities. The remaining profits help pay for Alex's ongoing
medical and insurance expenses. To learn more visit:

http://www.redjellyfish.com/cgi-bin/ad-eagle/go.pl?rtn=emailredir


Previous Message: Re: Rule problem?
Next Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Month Index: June, 2002

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    28 May 2002 16:29:19
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    28 May 2002 21:52:02
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Sebastian Lucier    28 May 2002 23:28:27
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    29 May 2002 12:01:19
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    George LaValle    29 May 2002 13:43:39
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Sebastian Lucier    29 May 2002 15:20:11
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    29 May 2002 16:54:02
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Burt Zoellick    29 May 2002 20:17:15
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Adam Miller    29 May 2002 23:05:04
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Paul Westermeyer    31 May 2002 03:30:49
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Ben Wafer    01 Jun 2002 03:37:39
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    01 Jun 2002 05:16:19
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Ben Wafer    01 Jun 2002 05:37:28
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    03 Jun 2002 14:45:44
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    03 Jun 2002 15:22:09
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    03 Jun 2002 15:48:56
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Diane Morrison    03 Jun 2002 22:02:01
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    04 Jun 2002 01:38:59
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    04 Jun 2002 13:45:47
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Burt Zoellick    04 Jun 2002 20:27:30
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Thatotherguy    05 Jun 2002 13:06:12
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Michael Sandy    05 Jun 2002 17:42:44
Re: Companies in Spelljammer    Diane Morrison    05 Jun 2002 22:30:53

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]