Previous Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Next Message: Re: New mechanic for strategic speed
Month Index: June, 2002
From: Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 07:26:52 -0700 Subject: Re: Rule problem?
> Accurate, yes, but not to within about a foot at 500 yards (which > would > be more or less comparable to the level of accuracy you would need to > hit a Bral-sized asteroid every time from a distance of miles out). > Now, > keep in mind that I'm not saying that it would be impossible to hit, > but > the majority of shots should miss (under ideal circumstances I would > think that about 1 out of every 3 or 4 shots should hit). Also keep > in > mind that I'm talking out of my arse here, as I don't know enough > about > the physics to make a truly accurate assessment. The physics is exactly my point. When we look at artillery in the real world we see friction from atmosphere as well as gravity (even in space) affecting trajectory. In SJ these things are not an issue for the majority of the flight. Hence such long shots become orders of magnitude easier. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
Previous Message: Re: Why Big ships?
Next Message: Re: New mechanic for strategic speed
Month Index: June, 2002
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Steve Zamboni | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | George LaValle | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | George LaValle | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Marco Dalmonte | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Burt Zoellick | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Steve Zamboni | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Static | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Diane Morrison | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Burt Zoellick | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Chris W | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Thatotherguy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Dave Lebert | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Ben Wafer | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | George LaValle | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Chris W | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Chris W | |||
| Re: Rule problem? | Downer, Chris |