Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
Next Message: Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
Month Index: May, 2002


From:     George LaValle <flamebringer@???????.com>
Date:     Tue, 7 May 2002 20:50:24 +0000
Subject:  Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
Yeah, trade makes for some interesting adventures.

You could play Pit, and consider each round a planet....
^The above statement is satire and not really a recommendation at all.

It's like characters buying groceries or shoeing their horses. It
happens...but not often enough it needs some sort of special mention.


>From: Static <eshum@????????.org>
>Reply-To: Discussion list for the Spelljammer campaign setting
><SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com>
>To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com
>Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
>Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:43:06 -0400
>
>In our last episode, Thatotherguy said:
> >>         The last two chapters describe the 'Shadows of the
> >> Spidermoon' setting specifically. It seems to be a pretty standard
> >> sphere (though crystal spheres are never mentioned one way or the
> >> other in the articles at all). It's fairly pedestrian though the
> >> economics, politics, and ecology of the setting are poorly thought
> >> out. The setting establishes foes and societies, but never explains
> >> why anyone would spelljam at all [aside from the rapacious illithids
> >> duping the drow into conquering the other planets for them]. Is there
> >> any trade, and if so between which planets? What goods are they
> >> exchanging? If there is no trade then why did the humans develop
> >> spelljammers at all? Still, the setting is quite salvageable by a GM
> >> willing to put some work in.
> >
> >On trade, if there is none, then why do elven traders occasionally use
> >human ships (for their extra cargo room) as merchantmen?
>
>         That wasn't the point, I think.  The point was that the article
>provides no *reason* to trade.  It just assumes trade is there.
>
>-Static
>
>--
>"Hmm... This looks familiar..."
>"It's broken, don't touch it."
>"Yes... That's what's so familiar!  I've seen many
>    broken things before..."  --Maison Otaku
>     --==<< http://www.darkwood.org/ >>==--
>
>********************************************************************
>The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp
>The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/
>To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
>with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Previous Message: Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
Next Message: Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon
Month Index: May, 2002

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Paul Westermeyer    07 May 2002 07:05:42
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Thatotherguy    07 May 2002 13:19:01
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Static    07 May 2002 19:43:06
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    George LaValle    07 May 2002 20:50:24
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Static    07 May 2002 21:19:27
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Sebastian Lucier    07 May 2002 21:46:01
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Static    07 May 2002 22:01:19
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    08 May 2002 12:01:57
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Thatotherguy    08 May 2002 13:08:30
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Thatotherguy    08 May 2002 13:10:48
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    08 May 2002 13:39:08
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Thatotherguy    08 May 2002 20:58:53
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    George LaValle    08 May 2002 21:42:50
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    George LaValle    08 May 2002 21:55:03
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Static    08 May 2002 22:25:34
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Sable O'Malley McRoy    08 May 2002 23:23:11
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Paul Westermeyer    09 May 2002 00:31:06
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Static    09 May 2002 00:40:59
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Sable O'Malley McRoy    09 May 2002 08:12:34
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    09 May 2002 12:50:34
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    09 May 2002 13:01:44
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Thatotherguy    09 May 2002 13:10:59
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Afterburner    09 May 2002 13:39:24
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Burt Zoellick    09 May 2002 22:30:57
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Paul Westermeyer    10 May 2002 18:18:11
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    13 May 2002 13:13:24
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Paul Westermeyer    21 May 2002 04:13:46
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    21 May 2002 12:58:53
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    woodelf    21 May 2002 16:23:20
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    woodelf    21 May 2002 16:59:17
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    21 May 2002 18:44:17
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Flits3 Frietmuts    22 May 2002 07:19:04
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    22 May 2002 12:32:36
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Diane Morrison    25 May 2002 02:58:59
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    Downer, Chris    25 May 2002 11:54:13
Re: Review:Shadow of the Spidermoon    woodelf    25 May 2002 15:03:51

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]