Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update

I thought they were classified as full blown artifacts I'll have to go back
and check my SJ material but I do believe they were classified as artifacts.
But if they are only classified as "near" or "Quasi" then that is fine since
all this would be is a powerful magic item. But in that case then a
teleportation ring and a ring of Limited Wishes should be "near" or Quasi"
artifacts as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Miller [mailto:nghtdrud@??????.net]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:44 PM
To: SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] Spelljammer d20 Review Update


Downer, Chris wrote:

> In 1e and 2e Artifacts were unique powerful magic items. And there usally
> were not more than one. Yet there were hundreds if not thousands
(depending
> on how many SJ ships were in your campaign) helms being used. That is why
I
> think that they should not have been classified as artifacts in 1e/2e
game.

        But they were _never_ classified as full-blown artifacts, just
'quasi-artifacts'.  Near-artifacts.  More powerful than your standard,
run-of-the-mill magic items, less powerful than artifacts.

--
Adam Miller

********************************************************************
The D&D; Homepage: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp
The Spelljammer Homepage: http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@??????.???????.com
with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message.