Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Spelljammer d20 Review
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update
Month Index: April, 2002


From:     "Downer, Chris" <Chris.Downer@?????????.com>
Date:     Mon, 1 Apr 2002 09:17:40 -0600
Subject:  Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update
       <<< Sure it did.  In 2e, they have damned good saves (2 or better on
a
d20).  They move ships at 100 million miles per day.  They move up to
100 tons of ship.  The spells really don't do justice to how powerful
helms really are (think about it...WE TODAY can't move things at 100
mmpd...if we did we'd be colonizing planets by now :)  Helms aren't
flashy, but they are damned powerful.
        In 3e, they'd be minor artifacts if they retained all of their
abilities.  If you take away some of their abilities then they become
major magic items.>>>

In 1e and 2e Artifacts were unique powerful magic items. And there usally
were not more than one. Yet there were hundreds if not thousands (depending
on how many SJ ships were in your campaign) helms being used. That is why I
think that they should not have been classified as artifacts in 1e/2e game.
Now in 3e I can go with the helms (if they had the full power of the
traditional helm) being minor artifacts but not major artifacts. In 1e/2e
the helms should have been just powerful magic items as a ring of
teleportation or a limited wish ring is.


Previous Message: Re: Spelljammer d20 Review
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update
Month Index: April, 2002

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Rick Conner    29 Mar 2002 16:23:11
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Downer, Chris    29 Mar 2002 16:47:20
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Drew Lee    29 Mar 2002 17:07:27
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    30 Mar 2002 01:20:22
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    30 Mar 2002 01:20:31
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    woodelf    30 Mar 2002 23:13:46
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Paul Westermeyer    31 Mar 2002 03:45:03
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Thatotherguy    31 Mar 2002 04:40:04
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Drew Lee    31 Mar 2002 05:37:00
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    31 Mar 2002 14:09:18
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    31 Mar 2002 14:44:35
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    31 Mar 2002 14:44:40
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Jon    31 Mar 2002 18:29:17
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Paul Westermeyer    31 Mar 2002 21:34:19
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Drew Lee    31 Mar 2002 22:07:02
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Mark T. Doolan    01 Apr 2002 05:03:08
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Drew Lee    01 Apr 2002 05:26:38
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Jon    01 Apr 2002 06:20:00
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Downer, Chris    01 Apr 2002 15:17:40
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Downer, Chris    01 Apr 2002 15:48:39
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Adam Miller    01 Apr 2002 22:44:02
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Downer, Chris    02 Apr 2002 13:44:07
Re: Spelljammer d20 Review Update    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2002 14:54:20

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]