Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Interperetation of the Crown of Corellon
Next Message: Re: The question of another Pbem.
Month Index: January, 2002


From:     Static <eshum@????????.org>
Date:     Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:06:46 -0500
Subject:  Re: fantasy relativity
Heya everyone,

        Hope you all had some good holidays. :)

In our last episode, Alex James said:
>last time Static explained the inabilty to observe the outside world while
>going at the speed of light by:
>"    Time dialation.  As you approach the speed of light, time outside
>your vehicle seems to slow down.  " so light gets too dim to see.
>
>After hitting the books I'm quite sure that time dialation actually works
>the other way around:  that the travelling body expierences less time than a
>stationary observer (in Einstienian relativity).

        Hit the books a bit harder. :)  There is no such thing as a
"stationary" observer.  It's all relative -- hence, "relativity".

>This means that for very fast moving ships, the view of GROG makes sense :
>    "??  I could see not being overtaken by light behind
>you. but shouldn't you hit it sideways.? from stuff to the side ofyou??
>and what about the stuff in front of you.??"

        Well, look at my longer post, which covers that.  Or, check
out

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/headlights.html
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html
and
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Padovani2/Pad2_1.html

        Light is *always* travelling at C, no matter how fast you're
moving.  It moves that fast for everyone -- the crew on the ship travelling
near C as well as the a "stationary" observer.

        Can some of you physics types comment on this?  Am I wrong about
all this?

-Static

--
              ...except for bunnies.

    --==<< http://www.darkwoodforest.com/ >>==--


Previous Message: Re: Interperetation of the Crown of Corellon
Next Message: Re: The question of another Pbem.
Month Index: January, 2002

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: fantasy relativity    Alex James    24 Dec 2001 21:10:38
Re: fantasy relativity    Jason Hosler    27 Dec 2001 14:53:01
Re: fantasy relativity    Adam Miller    27 Dec 2001 22:36:14
Re: fantasy relativity    Static    03 Jan 2002 01:06:46

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]