Previous Message: Re: Size names
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer 2000: a dumb but funny question
Month Index: September, 2001
From: Adam Miller <nghtdrud@??????.net> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:02:08 -0500 Subject: Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign?
Rip Van Wormer wrote:
>
> Hi. I've subscribed to this list a few times before when I had something I
> wanted to say about Spelljammer, but never for very long.
>
Hey. Should stick around...:)
> Anyway, what I wanted to say this time around was in regards to the
> discussion about the new Manual of the Planes and whether or not the various
> crystalline spheres represent planar boundaries.
>
Lol, I love the new Manual.
> It doesn't matter, in game mechanics terms.
>
Pretty much. I doubt it will change anyone's view of the spheres.
> Cool. You definitely want to assume all or at least a lot of the crystal
> spheres are part of the same plane.
>
> That's how I see it.
>
I'd kinda have some spheres grouped as a 'prime' and other spheres
grouped as another 'prime' and some spheres out all alone by themselves
:)
--
Adam Miller
Previous Message: Re: Size names
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer 2000: a dumb but funny question
Month Index: September, 2001
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (3e MotP) What kind of campaign? | Rip Van Wormer | |||
| Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign? | Silmacar Halfelven | |||
| Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign? | Adam Miller |