Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Size names
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer 2000: a dumb but funny question
Month Index: September, 2001


From:     Adam Miller <nghtdrud@??????.net>
Date:     Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:02:08 -0500
Subject:  Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign?
Rip Van Wormer wrote:
>
> Hi. I've subscribed to this list a few times before when I had something I
> wanted to say about Spelljammer, but never for very long.
>
        Hey.  Should stick around...:)

> Anyway, what I wanted to say this time around was in regards to the
> discussion about the new Manual of the Planes and whether or not the various
> crystalline spheres represent planar boundaries.
>
        Lol, I love the new Manual.

> It doesn't matter, in game mechanics terms.
>
        Pretty much.  I doubt it will change anyone's view of the spheres.

> Cool. You definitely want to assume all or at least a lot of the crystal
> spheres are part of the same plane.
>
> That's how I see it.
>
        I'd kinda have some spheres grouped as a 'prime' and other spheres
grouped as another 'prime' and some spheres out all alone by themselves
:)

--
Adam Miller


Previous Message: Re: Size names
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer 2000: a dumb but funny question
Month Index: September, 2001

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
(3e MotP) What kind of campaign?    Rip Van Wormer    07 Sep 2001 02:26:56
Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign?    Silmacar Halfelven    07 Sep 2001 08:36:32
Re: (3e MotP) What kind of campaign?    Adam Miller    08 Sep 2001 00:02:08

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]