Re: Submissions to Compendium...

Static wrote:
>         I have a proposal for this list to try and solve some of the
>above problems.  Let's drop this elaborate and official process we've
>got.  Nobody seems to want it -- not even me, and I wrote the damned thing!
>Compendium will follow a pattern closer to BtM (i.e. people send me stuff,
>or I find cool stuff, and it gets posted).  Some of the material needs to
>get past WotCs name brand gurus (the guys who'll tell us when we stray (:),
>but there'll be no official judging process.  The council will still exist
>in some form, but mostly to help keep me on track.
>
>         What does everybody think?  I'd prefer to have a discussion
>of ways to solve all the above issues -- I can't do it alone -- instead
>of simple, "Yeah go for it," posts.  Show me that you guys care.  I'm
>starting to get the feeling nobody does anymore... :(

First, I want to say that I have been wanting to submit some entries for
approval.  But, there are some things that I want to revise before I do so,
let alone find the time to do that.

Next, I have also found that the lack of submissions for approval by the
council has been a bit disappointing.  I have referred a few people to make
submissions to the council, which they did do.

Personally, I don't think that the submission guidelines were all that
strict.  However, if revising the submission guidelines will help foster an
environment that will inspire people to submit their works, then we should
do so.

The first thing that I would like to know is what people are looking for
regarding submission guidelines and what is thought to be fair.

Patrick Stutzman, Spelljammer Council Member (ICQ#:30560387)
starspeed@???????.com
http://www.geocities.com/starspeed_a
Netword:  *Hyrkulspace

The year is 2001.  The name of the place is The Internet.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp