Previous Message: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd)
Next Message: Re: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd)
Month Index: July, 2001
From: Jim Clunie <jim_clunie@???????.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 01:34:57 -0700 Subject: Re: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd)
A highly useful summary - thanks much for that. Jim C >From: Richard Gant > >I thought this might be of some interest. It's mildly off topic, but not >too bad (I hope). > >Rich Gant >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Richard Gant's Gaming Ghetto: > http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dunes/4656/ >The Returners Final Fantasy Role-Playing Game Site: > http://www.returnergames.com/ >The Turning Point: > http://home.dencity.com/RichardGant/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:36:04 -0500 >From: H-War Editor Mark Parillo <war@???.edu> >Reply-To: H-NET Military History Discussion List <H-WAR@?-???.???.edu> >To: H-WAR@?-???.???.edu >Subject: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail > >From: GMegargee@?????.org >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:59:33 -0400 > >The following information is from the website of the National Maritime >Museum in Greenwich, England (http://www.nmm.ac.uk). Unfortunately it does >not answer Dr. Lynn's question as to *when* the system came into being -- >sorry, John -- but it at least gives a clear explanation of the system for >those who are not familiar with it. If no one else can come up with the >date, an inquiry to the museum might be a good next step (but it costs >money). > >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Why are Royal Navy sailing ships sometimes described as 'First Rate', >'Third Rate,' etc.? > >A ship's 'rate' was basically decided by the number of guns she carried, >from the largest 120-gun First Rate, down to Sixth Rate 20-gun ships. The >smaller 'unrated' vessels (sloops, brigs, bomb vessels, etc) were >commanded by more junior officers (Commanders, Lieutenants), but a 'rated' >ship was always a Captain's command and always ship rigged, that is with >three square rigged masts. > >First Rate: The biggest ships of the fleet, with their gun batteries >carried on three decks, were generally used as flagships and fought in the >centre of the line-of-battle. They were armed with a minimum of 100 heavy >cannon, carried a crew of about 850 and were over 2000 tons Builder's >Measure (a formula for calculating the capacity of the ship, not the >displacement of the ship as is the practice nowadays). > >Second Rate: The Second Rate ships of the line were also three-deckers, >but smaller, and thus cheaper, versions of the First Rates. They mounted >between 90 and 98 guns, and, like the First Rates, fought in the centre of >the line-of-battle. Generally around the 2000 ton mark, they had a crew of >approximately 750. Like the First Rates, they had 32 pounder guns on the >gundeck, but 18 pounders instead of 24 pounders on the middle deck, with >12 pounders on the upper deck (compared to 18 or 24 pounders on First >Rates). Both First and Second Rates carried lighter guns or carronades on >their forecastles and quarterdecks. Unlike the First Rates, which were too >valuable to risk in distant stations, the Second Rates often served >overseas as flagships. They had a reputation for poor handling and slow >sailing. > >Third Rate: The most numerous line-of-battle ships were the two-decker >Third Rates, with between 64 and 80 guns. The most effective and numerous >of these was the 74-gun ship, in many ways the ideal compromise of >economy, fighting power and sailing performance, and forming the core of >the battlefleet. They carried 32 pounder guns on the gundeck and 18 >pounders on the upperdeck, with a crew of 600 to 650 men. > >Fourth Rate: Two decker ships of 50 to 60 guns, were, by the end of the >18th century, no longer reckoned to be 'fit to stand in the line of >battle'. Despite this, 50 gun ships were heavily engaged, in the line, at >the battles of Camperdown and Copenhagen. With two decks, their extra >accomodation made them suitable flagships for minor overseas stations, >while their relatively shallow draught made them suitable as headquarter >ships for anti-invasion operations in the North Sea and the English >Channel. They were also useful as convoy escorts, troopships and even, on >occasion, as convict transports. In normal service they had a main >armament of 18 pounders, a crew of 350 and measured around 1000 tons. > >Fifth Rate: These were the frigates, the Navy's 'glamour ships'. With >their main armament on a single gundeck, they were the fast scouts of the >battlefleet, when not operating in an independent cruising role, searching >out enemy merchant ships, privateers or enemy fleets. Developed from >early-18th century prototypes, the Fifth Rates of Nelson's time had a >variety of armaments and gun arrangements, from 32-gun ships armed with 12 >pounders to 36 and 38-gun frigates with 18 pounders, even some 40-gun >ships and cut down two-deckers with 24 pounders. Captured enemy frigates >were also used in service, and many of the best British-built ships were >copied or adapted from French designs. All classes carried lighter guns >and carronades on the quarterdeck and forecastle. Their tonnage ranged >from 700 to 1450 tons, with crews of 250 to 300 men. > >Sixth Rate: The Sixth Rates were smaller and more lightly armed frigates, >with between 22 and 28 nine-pounder guns, a crew of about 150, and >measuring 450 to 550 tons. There were never enough frigates; while Lord >Nelson was searching for the French fleet before the battle of the Nile he >said, 'Frigates! Were I to die this moment, want of frigates would be >found engraved on my heart!' > >Unrated vessels included the following: > >Sloop: A sloop of war was a vessel commanded by an officer with the rank >of Commander. Sloops could be armed with between 10 and 18 guns, be ship >rigged or brigs (two-masted square rig) and were capable of most of the >tasks undertaken by frigates, with the exception of fleet reconnaisance. >They were often armed with carronades, giving them a heavy punch at close >range. The cruiser class was the most numerous class of sailing warships >ever built, over 100 of these 380 ton, 18 gun brig sloops being built. >They carried a crew of 120 men. > >Bomb vessels and fireships: Developed from two-masted craft (ketches) >armed with mortars for shore bombardment, and first used by the French in >the late 17th century, the bomb vessel of the late 18th century had ship >rig. These strongly built ships were sometimes used for naval expeditions >to the Arctic: the young midshipman Nelson made one such voyage in the >Carcass. The fireship, intended as a means of setting an enemy ship on >fire, was often a converted merchantship, though some were specially built >for the Royal Navy. Both the bomb vessel and the fireship were only seldom >used in their designed role, but proved useful as patrol or convoy escort >sloops. > >Gunboats and gunbrigs: These were small, two-masted vessels, a >Lieutenant's command, and originally intended for anti-invasion patrol. >Later, they developed into more capable vessels, fit for a variety of >tasks. They were built to a wide variety of classes, and often had >evocative names, for instance Grappler, Growler and Griper were three >'Courser' Class gunbrigs. > >Cutters: Developed from craft used by English smugglers, these single >masted vessels were built for speed. They were employed as patrol boats >and despatch carriers. Schooners, two masted fore- and aft-rigged vessels >developed from American types, were similarly used. >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Geoff Megargee > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Previous Message: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd)
Next Message: Re: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd)
Month Index: July, 2001
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd) | Richard Gant | |||
| Re: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd) | Jim Clunie | |||
| Re: REPLY: English Rating of Fighting Sail (fwd) | Silmacar Halfelven |