Re: I'm back

I may just be being overly judgmental here, but I saw one step in the right
direction coupled with every three steps in the wrong direction. Until I see
a 3rd edition ship conversion, that is, official seafaring rules, I wouldn't
feel the slightest bit comfortable with working on 3e Spelljammer.

Essentially, with your repeated 3e spelljammer takes, you were putting
together a haystack of every idea anyone came up with. Aside from some
spirited work at converting the setting, by throwing in "fix" after "fix,"
you were writing a completely new setting, albeit quite similar to original
SJ.

To tell the truth, I'm happy to see the conversion hysteria dying down
lately, in favor of one or two actual Spelljammer conver-SA-tions. Instead
of a bunch of [censored] [expletive deleted] numbers, we started back toward
the exchange of ideas, which is all I ever liked about this list. If you
start to bring us back to the way it was a few months ago, then [expletive
deleted] you.

Yes, if we want a conversion, we should go with a small group-four or five
people who work well together and converse often, and whose rules calls we
trust-and trust them to come up with one conversion the majority of
3e-welcoming gamers can get used to. No more of this [expletive deleted]
"democratic" writing.

~George Lavalle

A Wax Phantom to destroy us all.

He's a phantom, a phantom who can walk through walls.

~diverse episodes of Scooby Doo

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com