Previous Message: Re: sorcerers at the helm & new helm designs
Next Message: Re: Helmsman Prestige Class
Month Index: March, 2001
From: Chris Paasch <chrispaasch@?????.com> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:34:51 -0800 Subject: Re: Sorcerers and Helmsmen and 3e, oh my
I think you hit the nail on the head this the ship-to-ship combat comment. To me it's the Rosetta Stone of SJ3E. The changes that are made to make STS combat work, in my opinion, have too big of a chance of impacting other things to not be done first. Just the opinion of a madman. Later Chis --- Static <eshum@??????????????.com> wrote: > Greets all, > > Well, I'm mostly back now, and thought I'd > reply to the various threads right > here instead of in a hundred little posts. > > Re: Sorcerers > I'm of the "Sorcerers should use Serial > Helms" school of thought. 3e, on > the other hand, is making everything very > "balanced", so, officially, I'd have to lean > towards letting 'em use normal helms. Of course, > from what I've heard of the Psionics > book, *psionicists* should also be able to use > normal helms as well. In other words, > do what works best for your campaign/peace of mind. > > Re: Helmsmen > At first I liked the idea, but I've been > swayed by the other side after > reading the posts. A helmsman prestige class is a > bit over-the-top. As to the > question of how do you handle high level parties, > well, the current SR system > makes it hard, but not impossible. My suggestion is > simply to downplay ship-to- > ship combat for high-level parties. They should be > fighting foes equal or greater > in power to themselves, but that doesn't mean every > merchant or patrol ship has to > cause them great trouble. > > Re: SJ3e > Am I correct in understanding that people > wantthe Council to come up with > something and stamp it official? I thought the > point was for people to play around > with conversions on their own, then we'll put 'em > together on the list and stamp > it official. Of the 169 people who voted, 24% are > already playing SJ3e. That's > over 40 people! Where are *they* in this > discussion? > I think our biggest stumbling block is still > ship-to-ship combat. All the > other stuff -- proficiencies, skills, races, etc. -- > is small-frys compared to it. > Without ship-to-ship all we have is a bunch of odd > races sailing around on boats. > Am I the only the one who thinks that? (It could > be. Don't be afraid to smack > some sense into me. (: ) If so, let me know and > I'll start converting (or, at > least, accepting conversions) post-haste. > > -Static > > -- > Don't mistake indifference for an open mind. > > --==<< http://www.darkwoodforest.com/ >>==-- > > ******************************************************************** > The D&D; Homepage: > http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Welcome.asp > The Spelljammer Homepage: > http://www.darkwoodforest.com/rpg/compendium/ > To unsubscribe, send email to > LISTSERV@??????.???????.com > with UNSUB SPELLJAMMER-L in the body of the message. ===== Chis __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Previous Message: Re: sorcerers at the helm & new helm designs
Next Message: Re: Helmsman Prestige Class
Month Index: March, 2001
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorcerers and Helmsmen and 3e, oh my | Static | |||
| Re: Sorcerers and Helmsmen and 3e, oh my | Invoker | |||
| Re: Sorcerers and Helmsmen and 3e, oh my | Chris Paasch | |||
| Re: Sorcerers and Helmsmen and 3e, oh my | Leroy Van Camp III |