Re: [Re: New Races and Old, 2e & 3e]

ThatOtherGuy wrote:
>
> The real problem is (ask anyone on the Greytalk list) that GH is now generic.
> It's not a real world, it just sucks in everything that's a lame idea of any
> sort.  One of the problems FR has faced over time (FR has other problems,
> don't get me wrong) and GH had faced at various points in its past (especially
> the Rose Estes novel line).  TSR has never really figured out that generic
> should truly be generic and world-specific shoudl truly be world-specific.
> The old I and N module lines are still some of the best ever produced, but
> they'd never fit in GH or FR as written (for the most part).

        Seems to me that Wizards is getting out of the whole 'campaign setting'
business altogether.  It seems that they really don't want to support
game settings anymore, instead opting for one-shot deals like Diablo.
The only world they're 'supporting' is FR, and the even they are only
scheduled to get 1 supplement per quarter (or something like that).
Greyhawk is RPGA now, and all other settings have been 'handed' to their
respective official sites.  Ah well, doesn't really matter to me any
more, just an observation.

--
Adam Miller