Previous Message: Re: Speed of thought
Next Message: Re: Lightspeed
Month Index: June, 2000
From: George Lavalle <flamebringer@???????.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:36:46 PDT Subject: Re: Lightspeed
"Red shift," eh? Sounds like atmospheric perspective. (That's an art term; stuff turns paler the farther away it is, and blurs.) If it's science, can't tell you worth a kobold's fart nugget. Uh, by the way; faster than light travel is very bad. The faster you go, the slower your time is compared to everybody else. You spend a simple five minutes spinning around the edge of the crystal sphere as a test, and a hundred years pass for everybody else. (and who wants to miss a century?) Another unfortunate occurance, the closer one gets to light speed the less visible one is. Yeah, the speed of light is constant. (186000 miles per second) But see, to be seen the light has to bounce off one and into the eyes of one's observers. Another problem; light from objects to the fore reaches you just as you reach them. You can only see them once you've passed through them. And you ever have to peel rubber to stop? The faster you're going, the harder stoping is. A sudden stop at light speed would require at least a Ship Shaken crit. George LaValle Just a few thoughts...... ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Previous Message: Re: Speed of thought
Next Message: Re: Lightspeed
Month Index: June, 2000
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: Lightspeed | George Lavalle | |||
| Re: Lightspeed | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: Lightspeed | Rupert Smith | |||
| Re: Lightspeed | jeffmandy | |||
| Re: Lightspeed | Peter Mikelsons | |||
| Re: Lightspeed | Tilaurin |