Re: Lightspeed (was Re: phlogiston travel)

> Richard Gant wrote:
> >
> > >         Wait a second, where did you see that rule?  Bit curious here
:)
> >
> > Well, nothing can propel a Spelljammer faster than 1157.407
miles/second,
> > anyway.  I'd always just assumed that that represented top speed for
> > anything in the Spelljammer universe., and I may have let my house rule
> > assumptions color what I remember of the rules.  Still, since I love
> > developing the funky Spelljammer physical laws, I really like this.
> >
> > I amy not be correct, however.
>
>         I have to agree with Thatotherguy; lightspeed is lightspeed.  If
> lightspeed is slowed to SJ speed, vision becomes impossible.  It gets
> into a realm of physics I don't even want to think about; it's too much
> of a headache:)

Sorry to interject here but according to Einstien's second postulate of
relativity the speed of light is constant no matter what speed the observer
travels at. So if we were to assume that light travelled at 1157.407 miles
per sec and the observer also travelled at this speed he could still see
quite well as the light he observes continues to travel at 1157.407 miles
per sec.....honest guv!!!

Jeff