Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: Some Thoughts on the Council...
Month Index: April, 2000


From:     Tilaurin <tilaurin@???????.???.au>
Date:     Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:12:18 +0930
Subject:  Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha
> >> Well, I do not think that this is going to work. Just agreeing on a
> >> standard layout, so that the site does not look like a patchwork of
> >> things, is going to be difficult.
> >
> >Its not all that hard to say "use this as a base, this font, this
background
> >colour, and this font colour"
>
> I don't think we have the right to ask Static to make any changes to his
> site. Design should remain in his hands.
>
> However, I'd suggest at this point we should stick to getting the
> council/Politbureau/Congress/Synod/Convocation:) going:)
>
> Once we've organized ourselves, then we can really get started on hammer
> out what will/son't should/shouldn't happen:)


i wasnt talking about statics site there, i was talking about the communal
site idea i spoke of.


Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: Some Thoughts on the Council...
Month Index: April, 2000

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha    Optimus    01 Apr 2000 10:44:27
Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha    Optimus    02 Apr 2000 13:55:29
Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 12:00:10
Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha    Paul Westermeyer    02 Apr 2000 18:17:11
Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 23:42:18

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]