Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: Some Thoughts on the Council...
Month Index: April, 2000
From: Tilaurin <tilaurin@???????.???.au> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:12:18 +0930 Subject: Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha
> >> Well, I do not think that this is going to work. Just agreeing on a > >> standard layout, so that the site does not look like a patchwork of > >> things, is going to be difficult. > > > >Its not all that hard to say "use this as a base, this font, this background > >colour, and this font colour" > > I don't think we have the right to ask Static to make any changes to his > site. Design should remain in his hands. > > However, I'd suggest at this point we should stick to getting the > council/Politbureau/Congress/Synod/Convocation:) going:) > > Once we've organized ourselves, then we can really get started on hammer > out what will/son't should/shouldn't happen:) i wasnt talking about statics site there, i was talking about the communal site idea i spoke of.
Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: Some Thoughts on the Council...
Month Index: April, 2000
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha | Optimus | |||
| Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha | Optimus | |||
| Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha | Tilaurin | |||
| Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Static's site and it's official status and wha | Tilaurin |