Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: The Crystal Sphere Chat Reminder
Next Message: What Canon Is. (Other than a Bombard +1)
Month Index: April, 2000


From:     Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com>
Date:     Sun, 2 Apr 2000 09:50:24 -0700
Subject:  Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future
> I'm sorry Paul, but I have to disagree. If there is a wish to create
> new SJ
> material that would be considered "official/canon" you need that
> council or
> voice. Otherwise Static might as well have said thanks for the offer,
> but no
> thanks, as there is at present no interest in the SJ community to
> create new
> material, and he could've remained a total fansite with no
> affiliation to
> WotC.

I think there is some stuff that could be produced that doesn't rely
too much on individual campaigns.  (not to toot my own horn) I see my
write-up of Dragon Rock as one of these.  We already know Dragon Rock
exists and where it is and my write-up simply gives it detail that fits
with what little there is about it in canon.  While it assumes Rock of
Bral is also in the Tears of Selune I've specifically designed it so
with little or mno modification the write-up can be used with Bral in
an entirely different sphere (preferably one that links directly to
Realmspace, however).

Also some new ships (I won't even try to say all), deckplans for
existing ships (Night Druid has a couple fro the often forgotten armada
IIRC) that aren't mapped (damselfly, flitter, and mosquito jump to mind
and beholder vessels would be great also), and so on would easily
adable also.  Personally I think adding Paul's SJ primer (minus
anything that may be specific to his campaign) would be one of our best
ideas as that would help intro people to SJ that have no idea what it
is and how it works.  Addign his timeline as a suggested one would be
another good step in the right direction.

 Granted I don't want to alienate anyone in the limited fanbase
> that we
> have, but if they have no wish to contribute to the "official" part
> of
> BtM's, there is always the fansite as it always has been. I think
> everyone
> is grown up enough not to feel alienated, by their choice not to
> contribute.

These assumptions tend to backfire, though this seems to be true of
those that post regularly on this list.  Of course 3rd Ed stuff may end
up alienating people.

> some answers. Thatotherguy had some great questions in a previous
> post that
> I plan on putting together in an email to that person in charge,
> whoever
> that maybe.

Thank you.


=====

Do you really think I'd admit to stealing that much money in my email sig?  Uhh, don't answer that.

The crazier the people are around me the saner I am.  That's why I work
in an asylum.  No, not the rubber room again!  No, but, but, my email...




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com


Previous Message: Re: The Crystal Sphere Chat Reminder
Next Message: What Canon Is. (Other than a Bombard +1)
Month Index: April, 2000

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Robert Baranowski    31 Mar 2000 16:20:36
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Bil Boozer    31 Mar 2000 16:48:40
Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Thatotherguy    31 Mar 2000 17:22:48
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Static    31 Mar 2000 18:59:33
Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Thatotherguy    31 Mar 2000 19:54:06
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Static    31 Mar 2000 20:21:45
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Kelly Pedersen    31 Mar 2000 21:13:43
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Adam Miller    31 Mar 2000 21:20:01
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Static    31 Mar 2000 21:38:09
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Patrick Stutzman    31 Mar 2000 22:05:13
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 04:22:10
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Thatotherguy    01 Apr 2000 14:13:23
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 17:38:58
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Ahzad    01 Apr 2000 18:40:10
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 11:35:29
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:50:24
Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future    Joseph Harrell    02 Apr 2000 19:38:24

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]