Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future
Next Message: Re: BtM's "Official" status.
Month Index: April, 2000


From:     Tilaurin <tilaurin@???????.???.au>
Date:     Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:09:55 +0930
Subject:  Re: BtM's "Official" status.
> Static should be considered a permanent member, I think. His work on BtMs,
> and it's official status more then qualify him:) Perhaps he and one or two
> volunteers could run the election?

id have to agree, with the volume of things flowing through his hands, this
man does indeed deserve the right hand, if not main chair.


Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future
Next Message: Re: BtM's "Official" status.
Month Index: April, 2000

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
BtM's "Official" status.    Static    01 Apr 2000 19:16:59
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Optimus    01 Apr 2000 21:58:07
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 21:19:46
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 21:19:49
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    02 Apr 2000 02:57:40
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 03:06:15
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    02 Apr 2000 08:04:38
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Pat    02 Apr 2000 10:28:02
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 11:39:55
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 11:41:47
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:55:48
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:58:22
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:59:51
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 17:13:30
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:20
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:23
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:28
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    03 Apr 2000 13:29:21
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    03 Apr 2000 22:01:42
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    George Lavalle    03 Apr 2000 22:28:50
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 00:40:41
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Rian McMurtry    04 Apr 2000 01:13:03
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 01:40:20
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thom Jones    04 Apr 2000 01:56:39
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    04 Apr 2000 03:58:23
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    04 Apr 2000 03:58:26
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Rian McMurtry    04 Apr 2000 03:44:08
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    04 Apr 2000 04:46:24
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Patrick Stutzman    04 Apr 2000 06:19:35
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Ahzad    04 Apr 2000 03:19:27
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:30:40
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:33:47
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:38:56
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:45:18
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    04 Apr 2000 14:20:50
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    04 Apr 2000 14:25:35
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 14:54:03
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 16:17:16
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thom Jones    04 Apr 2000 16:42:29
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 20:44:17
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    George Lavalle    04 Apr 2000 23:40:11

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]