Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: BtM's "Official" status.
Month Index: April, 2000
From: Tilaurin <tilaurin@???????.???.au> Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:05:29 +0930 Subject: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future
> Hmm. If new submissions have to be 3e, then I think the first thing > that should be done is creating an updated "boxed set" type thing > with 3e rules. thats all very well and good, but for a start, some of us are not purchasing 3e, and second, a lot of us (from comments ive seen around) dont like 3e. Thats the other reason i am suggesting this communal thing, to keep SJ alive, we shouldnt be restricted by rules and regs, but be able to write what we want.
Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Next Message: Re: BtM's "Official" status.
Month Index: April, 2000