Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future of SJ
Next Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Month Index: April, 2000


From:     Pat <patsite@???.net>
Date:     Sun, 2 Apr 2000 06:28:02 -0400
Subject:  Re: BtM's "Official" status.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for the Spelljammer campaign setting
> [mailto:SPELLJAMMER-L@??????.???????.com]On Behalf Of Paul Westermeyer
> Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2000 4:20 PM

<snipped>

> Should we have a straight set up, (say, the top three or five vote getters
> are elected?) or a rule that the winners have to have at least 50% of the
> vote?

<snipped>

I say have a *council* (BTW, can we choose a different name, council sounds
so ...blah to me) with an odd number, so that way if they need to vote on
something, there won't be any ties. Five would be a good number.
I agree about Static's position on the council. Without further ado, here
are more choices:

Paul
Leroy
Patrick (not me!)
and
Thatotherguy

Pat
patsite@???.net
"Daddy."
Deep Impact


Previous Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future of SJ
Next Message: Re: Static's site and it's official status and what that means for the future SJ
Month Index: April, 2000

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
BtM's "Official" status.    Static    01 Apr 2000 19:16:59
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Optimus    01 Apr 2000 21:58:07
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 21:19:46
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    01 Apr 2000 21:19:49
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    02 Apr 2000 02:57:40
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 03:06:15
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    02 Apr 2000 08:04:38
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Pat    02 Apr 2000 10:28:02
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 11:39:55
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    02 Apr 2000 11:41:47
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:55:48
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:58:22
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 16:59:51
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    02 Apr 2000 17:13:30
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:20
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:23
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    02 Apr 2000 17:59:28
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    03 Apr 2000 13:29:21
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    03 Apr 2000 22:01:42
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    George Lavalle    03 Apr 2000 22:28:50
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 00:40:41
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Rian McMurtry    04 Apr 2000 01:13:03
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 01:40:20
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thom Jones    04 Apr 2000 01:56:39
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    04 Apr 2000 03:58:23
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Paul Westermeyer    04 Apr 2000 03:58:26
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Rian McMurtry    04 Apr 2000 03:44:08
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Static    04 Apr 2000 04:46:24
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Patrick Stutzman    04 Apr 2000 06:19:35
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Ahzad    04 Apr 2000 03:19:27
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:30:40
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:33:47
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:38:56
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 13:45:18
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    04 Apr 2000 14:20:50
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Tilaurin    04 Apr 2000 14:25:35
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 14:54:03
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Adam Miller    04 Apr 2000 16:17:16
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thom Jones    04 Apr 2000 16:42:29
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    Thatotherguy    04 Apr 2000 20:44:17
Re: BtM's "Official" status.    George Lavalle    04 Apr 2000 23:40:11

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]