Re: BtM's "Official" status.

Greets,

On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Paul Westermeyer wrote:
>>>        The WotC guidelines for official sites state that they will
>>>need to be 3e.  This shouldn't be a problem since what the setting
>>>needs is canon flavor, and that's usually stat-less. :)  Besides, the
>>>guidelines don't prohibit having both 2e *and* 3e stats -- which is
>>>what I'm planning on suggesting to future authors.
>>
>>That really angers me, and my first response is to pull my stuff. I play
>>tested 3e, and I don't intend to convert anything over. I won't make any
>>specific plans yet, but that's a very annoying requirement.
>>
>>You mean the whole bloody site?
>
>BTw, My anger isn't at Static! When i got this I realized it came off that
>way. WoTC trying to eliminate 2e from the web angers me.

        :) I figured.  And yes, the whole bloody site.  At least the
official one, or so it seems like.  That is *precisely* why I'm breakin'
the site in two.  It'll be more of a pain to upkeep, but should help
keep things clean.

-Static


--
  We now return to our regularly scheduled program,
                 already in progress.

     --==<< http://snoopy.gwr.com/~eshum >>==--