Re: SJ Physics vs. SF Physics

--- "Downer, Chris" <Chris.Downer@?????????.com> wrote:
> >
> > Honestly, I don't see the point of pushing SF Physics (which aren't
> > true RL physics) into SJ.
>
> And I don't see why I have to use or even like SJ Physics. I've
> played with
> and have talked to a lot of D&D gamers over the years and most I have
> encountered were put off by the SJ physics and in turn did not play
> SJ. I
> almost did not get into it either, except I love SF and magic in
> space has
> always appealed to me. So I effortlessly converted it over to RL/SF
> physics.
> Any unusual effects are the result of magic.

Calm down.  You seem to be getting a little defensive here.  No one
here has said it was wrong to use more "true to science" physics
models.  We're just discussing the merits of each and offering our own
opinions.  Personally I think whatever floats your boat (no pun intended).

=====

Do you really think I'd admit to stealing that much money in my email sig?  Uhh, don't answer that.

The crazier the people are around me the saner I am.  That's why I work
in an asylum.  No, not the rubber room again!  No, but, but, my email...



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com