Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Official spelljammer Homepage
Next Message: Dragons Magazines with SJ Info
Month Index: January, 2000


From:     "Downer, Chris" <Chris.Downer@?????????.com>
Date:     Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:16:03 -0600
Subject:  Re: something about flitters and helms
> No duh. I did sort of mean to make it a magic item. (Also, I own the
> Dragon
> (#159) that introduces that cloaking helm. Right up with the orbus ring,
> but
> this would work better than cloaking, at least IMHO.
> Yeah, I've seen the cloaking helm. I just like permanence in my magic.
> (And
> this doesn't drain SR.) For a stealth craft, it just seems better to land
> on
> the deck unnoticed than to reveal yourself when the envelopes touch.
> The only disadvantage I can see is that cloaking helms exist already, and
> that watching that first step is harder when it's invisible (along with
> the
> deck below it, radius giving a sphere).
>
>
        I would say that the Invisible helm would be a more advance version
of the cloaking helm.


Previous Message: Re: Official spelljammer Homepage
Next Message: Dragons Magazines with SJ Info
Month Index: January, 2000

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: something about flitters and helms    George Lavalle    01 Jan 2000 15:30:50
Re: something about flitters and helms    Downer, Chris    06 Jan 2000 23:16:03
Re: something about flitters and helms    Tilaurin    07 Jan 2000 02:34:18

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]