Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Bomb weight
Next Message: Re: Strong/Weak Gravity Theory
Month Index: January, 1999


From:     steve swenson <scott@??????.????????.com>
Date:     Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:38:51 -0600
Subject:  Re: Magic vs Science
---Reply to mail from S. Wilson about [SPELLJAMMER] - Magic vs Science

>
>> training. You may get a race of beings out (perhaps mankind someday or
>> Illithids) there who are capable of external psionic feats and are trained,
>> but the magi does it when his race doesn't have the ability and he does it
>> through philosophy.
>
> Thought: why can't dwarves be wizards?
>
> Hemlock

  Explanation given by the texts is their inherent anti-magical nature.  I
suppose that a dwaf with a constitution low enough to recieve no bonuses
might have the potential to be a mage...  What do you think?  Of course I
think this means a constitution of 3 or less.

   --Steve


--
+++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++   Steven Swenson
### +++++++ ###   Technical Support Specialist
#### +++++ ####   Texas Micro Inc.
##### +++ #####   (800) 627-8700/(713) 541-8200 x110
###### + ######   (713) 541-8259 FAX
####### #######   steves@??????????.com
####### #######   scott@??????.????????.com


Previous Message: Re: Bomb weight
Next Message: Re: Strong/Weak Gravity Theory
Month Index: January, 1999

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    31 Dec 1998 07:20:55
Re: Magic vs Science    Avrjoe@???.com    31 Dec 1998 16:43:36
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    31 Dec 1998 20:20:51
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    31 Dec 1998 22:45:07
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    31 Dec 1998 23:46:26
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    31 Dec 1998 23:59:07
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 00:20:16
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    01 Jan 1999 00:29:36
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    01 Jan 1999 00:40:13
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 01:30:25
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 01:32:24
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    01 Jan 1999 06:14:35
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Arnold Stetzel    01 Jan 1999 09:10:26
Re: Magic vs Science    Avrjoe@???.com    01 Jan 1999 10:30:53
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 18:20:53
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 18:38:07
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    01 Jan 1999 23:07:27
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Arnold Stetzel    02 Jan 1999 08:36:52
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    04 Jan 1999 16:26:24
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 01:40:15
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 02:13:35
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    05 Jan 1999 03:45:12
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 04:50:37
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    05 Jan 1999 14:38:51
Re: Magic vs Science    Downer, Chris    05 Jan 1999 17:36:52
Re: Magic vs Science    Downer, Chris    05 Jan 1999 19:26:29
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul    05 Jan 1999 23:52:25
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    06 Jan 1999 02:37:19
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    06 Jan 1999 02:54:22
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    06 Jan 1999 03:39:12
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    06 Jan 1999 06:10:56
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul    06 Jan 1999 23:39:27

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]