Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Spelljamming
Next Message: Re: Spelljamming
Month Index: January, 1999


From:     Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com>
Date:     Tue, 5 Jan 1999 04:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject:  Re: Dragon-slaying
> One other thing. Aside from being rather monomaniacal, the wizard I'm
> thinking of is extremely intelligent, and very experienced. (No use
> testing a trap with runts.) That's why I'm pulling out every trick
in the
> book to use--if this were just any attacker, setbacks such as the
> Repulsion would probably be enough. In fact, I stated in my original
> message that an incautious wizard would almost certainly fall victim
to
> the trap, and that some of the proposed countermeasures relied on a
> measure of inside knowledge about the trap.
>
> I don't buy into the DM school of: "I shot you with my gun." "Yeah,
well I
> was wearing body armor." "Yeah, but I had explosive shot." "Yeah,
but my
> force field stopped it from detonating." It's just that any attacker
with
> time on his hand should, if he was wise, be as paranoid and patient as
> possible. If one probe fails, don't rush it, just try again another
day.

As long as the equally intelligent dragon is played the same way I
agree completely.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @?????.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Previous Message: Spelljamming
Next Message: Re: Spelljamming
Month Index: January, 1999

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Dragon-slaying    S. Wilson    04 Jan 1999 20:55:43
Re: Dragon-slaying    Thatotherguy    05 Jan 1999 12:21:44
Re: Dragon-slaying    S. Wilson    05 Jan 1999 16:28:05

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]