Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: [ADMIN] Nor is it a Place for Discussion of Realworld Religion
Next Message: Re: Question about dragons
Month Index: January, 1999


From:     Avrjoe@???.com
Date:     Fri, 1 Jan 1999 05:30:53 EST
Subject:  Re: Magic vs Science
In a message dated 1/1/99 2:30:23 AM Central Standard Time, pas@????????.net
writes:

<< This reminds of a set of two or three books in which each universe has six
 Laws.  No two laws are exactly the same but many are very similar.  A
 creature using some sort of Meta Law was able to exchange a law in one
 universe with a law from another universe, sending everyone familiar with
 those laws into stress as their system no longer functioned precicely as
 they were taught.  I can not find these books, but I am reasonably certain
 that the first book in the series was called "Master of the Five Magics".
 If I could locate these books (they are on one of these shelves, I am
 certain that I never discarded them) I could give the author, too.
  >>
	Sounds intersting and i am alway looking for new books to read.
you can find good insperation for new game ideas in the strangest places


Previous Message: Re: [ADMIN] Nor is it a Place for Discussion of Realworld Religion
Next Message: Re: Question about dragons
Month Index: January, 1999

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    31 Dec 1998 07:20:55
Re: Magic vs Science    Avrjoe@???.com    31 Dec 1998 16:43:36
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    31 Dec 1998 20:20:51
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    31 Dec 1998 22:45:07
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    31 Dec 1998 23:46:26
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    31 Dec 1998 23:59:07
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 00:20:16
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    01 Jan 1999 00:29:36
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    01 Jan 1999 00:40:13
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 01:30:25
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 01:32:24
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    01 Jan 1999 06:14:35
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Arnold Stetzel    01 Jan 1999 09:10:26
Re: Magic vs Science    Avrjoe@???.com    01 Jan 1999 10:30:53
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 18:20:53
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    01 Jan 1999 18:38:07
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    01 Jan 1999 23:07:27
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Arnold Stetzel    02 Jan 1999 08:36:52
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    04 Jan 1999 16:26:24
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 01:40:15
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 02:13:35
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    05 Jan 1999 03:45:12
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    05 Jan 1999 04:50:37
Re: Magic vs Science    steve swenson    05 Jan 1999 14:38:51
Re: Magic vs Science    Downer, Chris    05 Jan 1999 17:36:52
Re: Magic vs Science    Downer, Chris    05 Jan 1999 19:26:29
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul    05 Jan 1999 23:52:25
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    06 Jan 1999 02:37:19
Re: Magic vs Science    TandemArts@???.com    06 Jan 1999 02:54:22
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul Westermeyer    06 Jan 1999 03:39:12
Re: Magic vs Science    S. Wilson    06 Jan 1999 06:10:56
Re: Magic vs Science    Paul    06 Jan 1999 23:39:27

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]