Previous Message: Re: Elemental Physics
Next Message: Re: My Own Take on Mixing Ultratech and Sci-Fi wi th Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1999
From: Paul Arnold Stetzel <pas@????????.net> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 03:10:26 -0600 Subject: Re: Magic vs Science
>In a message dated 12/31/98 1:33:58 AM Central Standard Time, >westermeyer.3@???.edu writes: > >WARNING a bit long and i was sleepy i may have rambled but i have a good point ><< Regardless, there is a point, a starting line where science fails. > Considering the limits of our science it makes sense that we should, at > this point in development, assume that all that is unknown is science, just > as at an earlier point we assumed all that was unknown is magic. They > simply are not the same, anymore then Sprite and Seven-up are the same > because they look alike in a clear glass.:) >> > >there was a book i read (I read alot and don't rember the title) there are >forces that the universe runs on the strong and weak atomic force >electromagnetic force and a few others i don't rember the hole thing and all >the forces listed but the primise of the book was that during the big bang the >laws of physics (speed of Light Value of PI as an irational number etc) were >set and the forces formed of divstion of the 1 starting force the super force >wich lead to the expanding energy to organize as matter (matter being energy >bonded into a complex format of particals which can be released back in to a >more unrestrained and more basic form (aka E=MC2)) however if one truly >understood the nature of all the forces and of the energy matter relation >(wich the off quoted formula is merly the icebergs tip) then the super force >could be manipulated as the superforce can infulance and change the >interactions between the lesser forces and alter the relation of matter to >energy the Super force could alter the physical laws of the universe varrying >from slight bendings to totaly "breaking" the known physical laws as i >understand it most (i may be wrong my reading in science varrys from the main >stream to the wildly speculative and i can't rember the titel to check wich >this was) therotical quatim physics that Sci-fi writers use to defivy the laws >of physics either use superforce maniplation to bend physics (warp travel ) or >travel to a paralle universe where the superforce divided up in a slightly >differant way and thus the physical laws are not the same as ours (Hyperspace) > i am sure some of you are asking What this has to do with Magic or >spelljammer IMC there are differance universes with differances in there >physical laws magic and science are not the same and i use mana to be the >force of magic wich is shaped by will to cause effects that are visualised if >you have the skill to visualise the result and can harness enuff mana you can >so any thing sceice can not say ecaclty how mana works but can by obervation >note it's effects wich is to say mana is one of the forces that makes up the >superforce and can in quinity alter the superforce thusly altering the >physical laws of the universe they can not explane the why but the how >magicians can feel the why but most don't care about the how it just works but >they have a common frame of referance and can work together > i don't have any game mechanic on this this is just what i use as >the back >drop for how magic and Sceince can work together when i choose to have both in >1 campain and have them interact magic is still a mystery the how of Mana >manipulating the superforce is not understood not the how of shapeing it by >will or the why of mana behavoir Low and High mana zones (in AD&D no magic and >wild magic zones are quite simular in concept) form for no known reason mana >seems to do things for no reason but scieance can do what it is good at >observe and learn to use and aply that which is seen a magical fire if it can >be contained in a cilinder can run a inturnal combustion engine if a mage can >picture it well enuff magic can bend the laws of physics to alow as ship to go >to warp speed This reminds of a set of two or three books in which each universe has six Laws. No two laws are exactly the same but many are very similar. A creature using some sort of Meta Law was able to exchange a law in one universe with a law from another universe, sending everyone familiar with those laws into stress as their system no longer functioned precicely as they were taught. I can not find these books, but I am reasonably certain that the first book in the series was called "Master of the Five Magics". If I could locate these books (they are on one of these shelves, I am certain that I never discarded them) I could give the author, too.
Previous Message: Re: Elemental Physics
Next Message: Re: My Own Take on Mixing Ultratech and Sci-Fi wi th Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1999
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magic vs Science | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Avrjoe@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul Arnold Stetzel | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Avrjoe@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul Arnold Stetzel | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | TandemArts@???.com | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: Magic vs Science | Paul |