Re: Magic vs Science

>  The number of Wave answers was three higher and the experiment registered
> wave. They tried this 16 times (the number of people in the room) counting the
> paper votes each time and in each case except one the majority vote went with
> the apparatus' eventual reading immediately after the votes were cast.

[drums fingers]

Now *that* is interesting. When they wrote this up, what did the
scientific community have to say? Was this experiment ever repeated? How
well-known is it? Can you give a specific name or a researcher?

I ask for a specific name because I'm interested in tossing this into one
of the science newsgroups to look for comment. It would also let me do a
quick search through Dejanews on the same subject.

Happy New Year! [tu-bzzzz]

Hemlock